Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21406167›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2011

Distinct profiles of epigenetic evolution between colorectal cancers with and without metastasis.

Hai-Xing Ju, Byonggu An, Yasuyuki Okamoto, Keiko Shinjo, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Koji Komori, Takashi Hirai, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Sano, Akira Sawaki and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03832621 (NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03832621 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable (MSS), MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): the MAYA Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2019 to 2021Enrolled135ConditionsMetastatic Colorectal CancerArmsTemozolomide, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biological factors driving colorectal cancer metastasis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer metastasis - tricks of the trade.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hai-Xing JuDivision of Molecular Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Byonggu An
Yasuyuki Okamoto
Keiko Shinjo
Yukihide Kanemitsu
Koji Komori
Takashi Hirai
Yasuhiro Shimizu
Tsuyoshi Sano
Akira Sawaki
Masahiro Tajika
Kenji Yamao
Makiko Fujii
Hideki Murakami
Hirotaka Osada
Hidemi Ito
Ichiro Takeuchi
Yoshitaka Sekido
Yutaka Kondo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver metastasis is a fatal step in the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the epigenetic evolution of this process is largely unknown. To decipher the epigenetic alterations during the development of liver metastasis, the DNA methylation status of 12 genes, including 5 classical CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) markers, was analyzed in 62 liver metastases and in 78 primary CRCs (53 stage I-III; 25 stage IV). Genome-wide methylation analysis was also performed in stage I-III CRCs and in paired primary and liver metastatic cancers. Methylation frequencies of MGMT and TIMP3 increased progressively from stage I-III CRCs to liver metastasis (P = 0.043 and P = 0.028, respectively). The CIMP-positive cases showed significantly earlier recurrence of disease than did CIMP-negative cases with liver metastasis (P = 0.030), whereas no such difference was found in stage I-III CRCs. Genome-wide analysis revealed that more genes were methylated in stage I-III CRCs than in paired stage IV samples (P = 0.008). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that stage I-III CRCs and stage IV CRCs were clustered into two distinct subgroups, whereas most paired primary and metastatic cancers showed similar methylation profiles. This analysis revealed distinct methylation profiles between stage I-III CRCs and stage IV CRCs, which may reflect differences in epigenetic evolution during progression of the disease. In addition, most methylation status in stage IV CRCs seems to be established before metastasis.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAgedCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticNeoplasm MetastasisPhenotypeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21406167
PMCPMC3078452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.