Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21406111›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2011

Comparative genotypic and pathogenic examination of Campylobacter concisus isolates from diarrheic and non-diarrheic humans.

Lisa D Kalischuk, G Douglas Inglis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Global epidemiology of campylobacteriosis and the impact of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Population Biology and Comparative Genomics of Campylobacter Species.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. [Oral microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Campylobacter Concisus and Its Effect on the Expression of CDX1 and COX2Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Clinical Importance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Complete Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa D KalischukAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403-1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
G Douglas Inglis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCampylobacter concisus is an emerging enteric pathogen, yet it is commonly isolated from feces and the oral cavities of healthy individuals. This genetically complex species is comprised of several distinct genomospecies which may vary in pathogenic potential.

resultsWe compared pathogenic and genotypic properties of C. concisus fecal isolates from diarrheic and healthy humans residing in the same geographic region. Analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiles delineated two main clusters. Isolates assigned to AFLP cluster 1 belonged to genomospecies A (based on genomospecies-specific differences in the 23S rRNA gene) and were predominantly isolated from healthy individuals. This cluster also contained a reference oral strain. Isolates assigned to this cluster induced greater expression of epithelial IL-8 mRNA and more frequently contained genes coding for the zonnula occludins toxin and the S-layer RTX. Furthermore, isolates from healthy individuals induced greater apoptotic DNA fragmentation and increased metabolic activity than those from diarrheic individuals, and isolates assigned to genomospecies A (of which the majority were from healthy individuals) exhibited higher haemolytic activity compared to genomospecies B isolates. In contrast, AFLP cluster 2 was predominated by isolates belonging to genomospecies B and those from diarrheic individuals. Isolates from this cluster displayed greater mean epithelial invasion and translocation than cluster 1 isolates.

conclusionTwo main genetically distinct clusters (i.e., genomospecies) were identified among C. concisus fecal isolates from healthy and diarrheic individuals. Strains within these clusters differed with respect to clinical presentation and pathogenic properties, supporting the hypothesis that pathogenic potential varies between genomospecies. ALFP cluster 2 isolates were predominantly from diarrheic patients, and exhibited higher levels of epithelial invasion and translocation, consistent with known roles for these factors in diarrhoeal disease. Conversely, isolates from healthy humans and AFLP cluster 1 or genomospecies A (which were predominantly isolated from healthy humans) exhibited increased haemolytic ability, apoptotic DNA fragmentation, IL-8 induction, and/or carriage of toxin genes. Given that this cluster contains an oral reference strain, it is possible that some of the AFLP cluster 1 isolates are periodontal pathogens and may cause disease, albeit via a different mechanism than those from AFLP cluster 2.

Indexed as

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisBacterial AdhesionBacterial Typing TechniquesCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCell LineDiarrheaDNA FragmentationFecesGenes, BacterialGenotypeHemolysisHumansInterleukin-8RNA, Ribosomal, 23SCXCL8 protein, humanInterleukin-8RNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID21406111
PMCPMC3068073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.