ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2011
Using bacterial biomarkers to identify early indicators of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation onset.
Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the neutral theory of biodiversity with the microbiome dataset from cystic fibrosis patients.Medicine · 2018Observational
- Niche partitioning of a pathogenic microbiome driven by chemical gradients.Science advances · 2018Article
- Early pulmonary disease manifestations in cystic fibrosis mice.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2016Article
- Metabolomics of pulmonary exacerbations reveals the personalized nature of cystic fibrosis disease.PeerJ · 2016Article
- Serum Iron Level Is Associated with Time to Antibiotics in Cystic Fibrosis.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- Novel outcome measures for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2015Review
- Analysis of changes in diversity and abundance of the microbial community in a cystic fibrosis patient over a multiyear period.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute periods of pulmonary exacerbation are the single most important cause of morbidity in cystic fibrosis patients, and may be associated with a loss of lung function. Intervening prior to the onset of a substantially increased inflammatory response may limit the associated damage to the airways. While a number of biomarker assays based on inflammatory markers have been developed, providing useful and important measures of disease during these periods, such factors are typically only elevated once the process of exacerbation has been initiated. Identifying biomarkers that can predict the onset of pulmonary exacerbation at an early stage would provide an opportunity to intervene before the establishment of a substantial immune response, with major implications for the advancement of cystic fibrosis care. The precise triggers of pulmonary exacerbation remain to be determined; however, the majority of models relate to the activity of microbes present in the patient's lower airways of cystic fibrosis. Advances in diagnostic microbiology now allow for the examination of these complex systems at a level likely to identify factors on which biomarker assays can be based. In this article, we discuss key considerations in the design and testing of assays that could predict pulmonary exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.