ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011
Evolutionary approach to predicting the binding site residues of a protein from its primary sequence.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCIPG: A comprehensive framework for protein complex identification based on a probabilistic graphical model.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A Bioinformatic Analysis Predicts That Cannabidiol Could Function as a Potential Inhibitor of the MAPK Pathway in Colorectal Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Structural and functional insights into ABHD5, a ligand-regulated lipase co-activator.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identifying Primate ACE2 Variants That Confer Resistance to SARS-CoV-2.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Molecular Basis of ABHD5 Lipolysis Activation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- LISE: a server using ligand-interacting and site-enriched protein triangles for prediction of ligand-binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- PSC: protein surface classification.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Recognizing protein-ligand binding sites by global structural alignment and local geometry refinement.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2012Article
- Ionic channels as targets for drug design: a review on computational methods.Pharmaceutics · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein binding site residues, especially catalytic residues, play a central role in protein function. Because more than 99% of the ∼ 12 million protein sequences in the nonredundant protein database have no structural information, it is desirable to develop methods to predict the binding site residues of a protein from its primary sequence. This task is highly challenging, because the binding site residues constitute only a small portion of a protein. However, the binding site residues of a protein are clustered in its functional pocket(s), and their spatial patterns tend to be conserved in evolution. To take advantage of these evolutionary and structural principles, we constructed a database of ∼ 50,000 templates (called the pocket-containing segment database), each of which includes not only a sequence segment that contains a functional pocket but also the structural attributes of the pocket. To use this database, we designed a template-matching technique, termed residue-matching profiling, and established a criterion for selecting templates for a query sequence. Finally, we developed a probabilistic model for assigning spatial scores to matched residues between the template and query sequence in local alignments using a set of selected scoring matrices and for computing the binding likelihood of each matched residue in the query sequence. From the likelihoods, one can predict the binding site residues in the query sequence. An automated computational pipeline was developed for our method. A performance evaluation shows that our method achieves a 70% precision in predicting binding site residues at 60% sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.