Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21402844›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals in 2009.

James A Karlowsky, Heather J Adam, Melanie R Decorby, Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens, Daryl J Hoban, George G Zhanel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Emerging Strategies to Combat β-Lactamase Producing ESKAPE Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Analysis of Potential β-Lactam Surrogates To PredictJournal of clinical microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Coagulase-negative staphylococci.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Investigational antimicrobial agents of 2013.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013
    Review
  15. New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2013
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ceftaroline activity tested against contemporary Latin American bacterial pathogens (2011).The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James A KarlowskyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820 Sherbrook St., Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A1R9, Canada. jkarlowsky@hsc.mb.ca
Heather J Adam
Melanie R Decorby
Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens
Daryl J Hoban
George G Zhanel
University of Manitoba · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CADiagnostic Services Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro activities of ceftaroline and comparative agents were determined for a collection of the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens from hospital-associated patients across Canada in 2009 as part of the ongoing CANWARD surveillance study. In total, 4,546 isolates from 15 sentinel Canadian hospital laboratories were tested using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. Compared with other cephalosporins, including ceftobiprole, cefepime, and ceftriaxone, ceftaroline exhibited the greatest potency against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), with a MIC₉₀ of 0.25 μg/ml. Ceftaroline also demonstrated greater potency than ceftobiprole against community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (MIC₉₀, 0.5 μg/ml) and health care-associated MRSA (MIC₉₀, 1 μg/ml) and was at least 4-fold more active than other cephalosporins against Staphylococcus epidermidis; all isolates of MSSA and MRSA tested were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC, ≤1 μg/ml). Against streptococci, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, ceftaroline MICs (MIC₉₀, ≤0.03 μg/ml) were comparable to those of ceftobiprole; however, against penicillin-nonsusceptible, macrolide-nonsusceptible, and multidrug-nonsusceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae, ceftaroline demonstrated 2- to 4-fold and 4- to 16-fold more potent activities than those of ceftobiprole and ceftriaxone, respectively. All isolates of S. pneumoniae tested were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC, ≤0.25 μg/ml). Among Gram-negative isolates, ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity (MIC₉₀, ≤0.5 μg/ml) against Escherichia coli (92.2% of isolates were susceptible), Klebsiella pneumoniae (94.1% of isolates were susceptible), Proteus mirabilis (97.7% of isolates were susceptible), and Haemophilus influenzae (100% of isolates were susceptible). Ceftaroline demonstrated less potent activity (MIC₉₀, ≥4 μg/ml) against Enterobacter spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella oxytoca, Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Overall, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against a recent collection of the most frequently encountered Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from patients attending hospitals across Canada in 2009.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCanadaCeftarolineCephalosporinsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID21402844
PMCPMC3101400
OpenAlexW2126389238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.