Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21402761›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2011

Cross-reactive protection against enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection by enteropathogenic E. coli in a mouse model.

Carla Calderon Toledo, Ida Arvidsson, Diana Karpman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detection and analysis of Shiga toxin producing and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in cattle from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  4. The Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ABToxins · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Treatment Strategies for Infections With Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical implications of enteroadherent Escherichia coli.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carla Calderon ToledoDepartment of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
Ida Arvidsson
Diana Karpman
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are related attaching and effacing (A/E) pathogens. The genes responsible for the A/E pathology are carried on a chromosomal pathogenicity island termed the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE). Both pathogens share a high degree of homology in the LEE and additional O islands. EHEC prevalence is much lower in areas where EPEC is endemic. This may be due to the development of antibodies against common EPEC and EHEC antigens. This study investigated the hypothesis that EPEC infections may protect against EHEC infections. We used a mouse model to inoculate BALB/c mice intragastrically, first with EPEC and then with EHEC (E. coli O157:H7). Four control groups received either a nonpathogenic E. coli (NPEC) strain followed by EHEC (NPEC/EHEC), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by EHEC (PBS/EHEC), EPEC/PBS, or PBS/PBS. Mice were monitored for weight loss and symptoms. EPEC colonized the intestine after challenge, and mice developed serum antibodies to intimin and E. coli secreted protein B (encoded in the LEE). Prechallenge with an EPEC strain had a protective effect after EHEC infection, as only a few mice developed mild symptoms, from which they recovered. These mice had an increase in body weight similar to that in control animals, and tissue morphology exhibited mild intestinal changes and normal renal histology. All mice that were not prechallenged with the EPEC strain developed mild to severe symptoms after EHEC infection, with weight loss as well as intestinal and renal histopathological changes. These data suggest that EPEC may protect against EHEC infection in this mouse model.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial SheddingBody WeightCross ProtectionEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsImmunoblottingMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID21402761
PMCPMC3125830
OpenAlexW2134170261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.