Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21402602›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2011

Causes of death and relative survival of older women after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Mara A Schonberg, Edward R Marcantonio, Long Ngo, Donglin Li, Rebecca A Silliman, Ellen P McCarthy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mara A SchonbergBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1309 Beacon St, Office 202, Brookline, MA 02446, USA. mschonbe@bidmc.harvard.edu
Edward R Marcantonio
Long Ngo
Donglin Li
Rebecca A Silliman
Ellen P McCarthy

Funding

Mid-Career Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG035075 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARCANTONIO, EDWARD R · 2010 to 2021
$1.9M
Benefits and Burdens of Screening Oldest-old Women: the Case of MammographyK23AG030964 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHONBERG, MARA A · 2009 to 2011
$324k
Benefits and Burdens of Screening Oldest-old Women: the Case of MammographyK23AG028584 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHONBERG, MARA A · 2007 to 2008
$313k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028584NIA NIH HHS K23AG028584NIA NIH HHS K23 AG030964NIA NIH HHS K24 AG035075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand the impact of breast cancer on older women's survival, we compared survival of older women diagnosed with breast cancer with matched controls. METHODS Using the linked 1992 to 2003 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare data set, we identified women age 67 years or older who were newly diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer. We identified women not diagnosed with breast cancer from the 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries residing in SEER areas.We matched patient cases to controls by birth year and registry (99% or 66,039 [corrected] patient cases matched successfully). We assigned the start of follow-up for controls as the patient cases' date of diagnosis. Mortality data were available through 2006. We compared survival of women with breast cancer by stage with survival of controls using multivariable proportional hazards models adjusting for age at diagnosis, comorbidity, prior mammography use, and sociodemographics. We repeated these analyses stratifying by age.

resultsMedian follow-up time was 7.7 years. Differences between patient cases and controls in sociodemographics and comorbidities were small (< 4%). Women diagnosed with DCIS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.7 to 0.7) or stage I disease (aHR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.8 to 0.8) had slightly lower mortality than controls.Women diagnosed with stage II disease or higher had greater mortality than controls (stage II disease:aHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.2). The association of a breast cancer diagnosis with mortality declined with age among women with advanced disease [corrected].

conclusionCompared with matched controls, a diagnosis of DCIS or stage I breast cancer in older women is associated with better [corrected] survival, whereas a diagnosis of stage II or higher breast cancer is associated with worse survival.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCase-Control StudiesCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLife ExpectancyMammographyMedicareNeoplasm StagingOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID21402602
PMCPMC3138627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.