Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21402035›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Backbone and side-chain contributions in protein denaturation by urea.

Deepak R Canchi, Angel E García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Atomic view of cosolute-induced protein denaturation probed by NMR solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Urea-aromatic interactions in biology.Biophysical reviews · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Peptide Solubility Limits: Backbone and Side-Chain Interactions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepak R CanchiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.
Angel E García

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea is a commonly used protein denaturant, and it is of great interest to determine its interaction with various protein groups to elucidate the molecular basis of its effect on protein stability. Using the Trp-cage miniprotein as a model system, we report what we believe to be the first computation of changes in the preferential interaction coefficient of the protein upon urea denaturation from molecular-dynamics simulations and examine the contributions from the backbone and the side-chain groups. The preferential interaction is obtained from reversible folding/unfolding replica exchange molecular-dynamics simulations of Trp-cage in presence of urea, over a wide range of urea concentration. The increase in preferential interaction upon unfolding is dominated by the side-chain contribution, rather than the backbone. Similar trends are observed in simulations using two different force fields, Amber94 and Amber99sb, for the protein. The magnitudes of the side-chain and backbone contributions differ in the two force fields, despite containing identical protein-solvent interaction terms. The differences arise from the unfolded ensembles sampled, with Amber99sb favoring conformations with larger surface area and lower helical content. These results emphasize the importance of the side-chain interactions with urea in protein denaturation, and highlight the dependence of the computed driving forces on the unfolded ensemble sampled.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHydrogen BondingPeptidesProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingTemperatureUreaPeptidesTrp-cage peptideUrea

Identifiers

PMID21402035
PMCPMC3059734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.