Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21401726›Full record

ArticleFEMS immunology and medical microbiology2011

The early humoral immune response to Bacillus anthracis toxins in patients infected with cutaneous anthrax.

Karen E Brenneman, Mehmet Doganay, Arya Akmal, Stanley Goldman, Darrell R Galloway, Alfred J Mateczun, Alan S Cross, Leslie W Baillie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS immunology and medical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human Anthrax: Update of the Diagnosis and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Periorbital cellulitis due to cutaneous anthrax.International ophthalmology · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Anthrax outbreaks in Bangladesh, 2009-2010.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen E BrennemanBiological Defense Research Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mehmet Doganay
Arya Akmal
Stanley Goldman
Darrell R Galloway
Alfred J Mateczun
Alan S Cross
Leslie W Baillie
Naval Medical Research Command · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USErciyes University · TRThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Vaccine strategy for broad spectrum protection agains non-typhoidal salmonellU54AI057168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, JUDITH M. · 2003 to 2013
$91.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057168NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057168-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, produces a tripartite toxin composed of two enzymatically active subunits, lethal factor (LF) and edema factor (EF), which, when associated with a cell-binding component, protective antigen (PA), form lethal toxin and edema toxin, respectively. In this preliminary study, we characterized the toxin-specific antibody responses observed in 17 individuals infected with cutaneous anthrax. The majority of the toxin-specific antibody responses observed following infection were directed against LF, with immunoglobulin G (IgG) detected as early as 4 days after the onset of symptoms in contrast to the later and lower EF- and PA-specific IgG responses. Unlike the case with infection, the predominant toxin-specific antibody response of those immunized with the US anthrax vaccine absorbed and UK anthrax vaccine precipitated licensed anthrax vaccines was directed against PA. We observed that the LF-specific human antibodies were, like anti-PA antibodies, able to neutralize toxin activity, suggesting the possibility that they may contribute to protection. We conclude that an antibody response to LF might be a more sensitive diagnostic marker of anthrax than to PA. The ability of human LF-specific antibodies to neutralize toxin activity supports the possible inclusion of LF in future anthrax vaccines.

Indexed as

AnthraxAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunoglobulin GSkin Diseases, Bacterialanthrax toxinAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial ToxinsImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID21401726
PMCPMC3605738
OpenAlexW1757308232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.