Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21400116›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2011

Use of PCR to detect Entamoeba gingivalis in diseased gingival pockets and demonstrate its absence in healthy gingival sites.

Robert D Trim, Michael A Skinner, Mary B Farone, John D Dubois, Anthony L Newsome

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RETRACTED: Association ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Taxonomy of the GenusPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Parasitological and molecular study ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Article
  6. Pilot Study on the Prevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Journal of dental research · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Oral Colonization byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence and Associated-Factors forIranian journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Oral microbiome and health.AIMS microbiology · 2018
    Review
  19. Reassessing the Role ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert D TrimUniversity of Tennessee School of Dentistry, 875 Union Ave, Memphis, TN, USA.
Michael A Skinner
Mary B Farone
John D Dubois
Anthony L Newsome
Middle Tennessee State University · USInstitute for Advanced Medical Research · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigators using light microscopy have identified the protozoan parasite Entamoeba gingivalis from diseased gingival pockets for nearly 100 years. The objective of the present investigation was to develop a molecular biology approach for determining the presence of E. gingivalis in both diseased gingival pockets and healthy gingival sites. For this, a previously developed conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was evaluated and a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was developed. Paper points were inserted into the base of the sulcus of both diseased gingival pockets and healthy gingival sites. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA mini kit, and subsequently analyzed using conventional and real-time PCR analysis. A previously described primer set specific for the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rDNA) of E. gingivalis was used for the conventional PCR. For the real-time PCR, a primer set was designed to amplify a 135-bp fragment inside the SSU rDNA of E. gingivalis. A conventional PCR assay detected E. gingivalis in 27% of diseased gingival pockets. The real-time PCR using a different primer set detected protozoa in 69% of diseased pocket sites. Thus, the latter technique proved more sensitive for detection of E. gingivalis. No E. gingivalis were detected in any of the healthy gingival pocket sites using either type of PCR assay. Results support a concept that the presence of E. gingivalis is associated only with diseased gingival pocket sites. The newly described methodology may also serve to provide a novel eukaryotic cell marker of disease status in gingival pockets.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalEntamoebaEntamoebiasisGenes, rRNAGingival PocketHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID21400116
OpenAlexW1976556199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.