ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012
ER-/ER+ breast cancer cell lines exhibited different resistance to paclitaxel through pulse selection.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paclitaxel-induced stress granules increaseJournal of biomedical research · 2021Article
- Effect of the association of 1-methyl-DL-tryptophan with paclitaxel on the expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in cultured cancer cells from patients with breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015Article
- Differential drug resistance acquisition to doxorubicin and paclitaxel in breast cancer cells.Cancer cell international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we established two PTX-resistant breast cancer cell lines, 231 TIM10 and MCF-7 TIM10, from ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells and ER-positive MCF-7 cells by pulse selection, respectively. We found that 231 TIM10 variants acquired higher drug resistance than MCF-7 TIM10 variants by the pulse selection, although ER-positive MCF-7 cells were not as sensitive as ER-negative MDA-MB-231 to the initial pulses with PTX. 231 TIM10 had 11.9-fold greater resistance (RI = 11.9) than the parental MDA-MB-231 cells, while MCF-7 TIM10 got 5.5-fold resistance (RI = 5.5) when compared with the parental MCF-7 cells. In the presence of 5nM PTX, 231 TIM10 cells formed colonies, but no colony formed when MCF-7 TIM10 cells were cultured in the same condition. These data have two implications. First, the ER expression state might be an important determinant for the response of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel treatment. Second, ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer cells develop drug-resistance phenotype with distinctive mechanisms. Our work not only established useful models for studying the paclitaxel resistance but also provides interesting clues to understand the mechanisms underlying the drug resistance of ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.