Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21398637›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements.

Anna Maciag, Clelia Peano, Alessandro Pietrelli, Thomas Egli, Gianluca De Bellis, Paolo Landini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  9. Investigating the Prevalence of RNA-Binding Metabolic Enzymes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Transcriptomic Analysis ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. EvolvingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna MaciagDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Clelia Peano
Alessandro Pietrelli
Thomas Egli
Gianluca De Bellis
Paolo Landini
University of Milan · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by σ subunits, which assemble with RNA polymerase core enzyme (E) during transcription initiation. However, σ(70) (the housekeeping σ subunit) and σ(S) (an alternative σ subunit mostly active during slow growth) recognize almost identical promoter sequences, thus raising the question of how promoter selectivity is achieved in the bacterial cell. To identify novel sequence determinants for selective promoter recognition, we performed run-off/microarray (ROMA) experiments with RNA polymerase saturated either with σ(70) (Eσ(70)) or with σ(S) (Eσ(S)) using the whole Escherichia coli genome as DNA template. We found that Eσ(70), in the absence of any additional transcription factor, preferentially transcribes genes associated with fast growth (e.g. ribosomal operons). In contrast, Eσ(S) efficiently transcribes genes involved in stress responses, secondary metabolism as well as RNAs from intergenic regions with yet-unknown function. Promoter sequence comparison suggests that, in addition to different conservation of the -35 sequence and of the UP element, selective promoter recognition by either form of RNA polymerase can be affected by the A/T content in the -10/+1 region. Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirmed that an A/T bias in the -10/+1 region could improve promoter recognition by Eσ(S).

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticBase SequenceConserved SequenceDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliGene Expression ProfilingMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein SubunitsRegulonSigma FactorDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesProtein SubunitsRNA polymerase sigma 70Sigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID21398637
PMCPMC3141248
OpenAlexW2079224194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.