Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21398063›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2011

Retrospectively gated cardiac cine imaging with temporal and spatial acceleration.

Bruno Madore, W Scott Hoge, Tzu-Cheng Chao, Gary P Zientara, Renxin Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2011
    Article
  6. Diastolic filling vortex forces and cardiac adaptations: probing the epigenetic nexus.Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno MadoreDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. bruno@bwh.harvard.edu
W Scott Hoge
Tzu-Cheng Chao
Gary P Zientara
Renxin Chu

Funding

ULTRASOUND THERAPY DELIVERY THROUGH INTACT SKULLU41RR019703 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KAPUR, TINA · 2005 to 2009
$17.2M
SURGICAL PLANNING SIMULATION AND INTRAOPERATIVE GUIDANCEP01CA067165 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HYNYNEN, KULLERVO · 1995 to 2011
$11.2M
Free-Breathing 3D Cardiac MR ImagingR01HL073319 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MADORE, BRUNO · 2003 to 2005
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA067165NCI NIH HHS P01-CA67165NCRR NIH HHS U41 RR019703NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parallel imaging methods are routinely used to accelerate the image acquisition process in cardiac cine imaging. The addition of a temporal acceleration method, whereby k-space is sampled differently for different time frames, has been shown in prior work to improve image quality as compared to parallel imaging by itself. However, such temporal acceleration strategies prove difficult to combine with retrospectively gated cine imaging. The only currently published method to feature such combination, by Hansen et al. [Magn Reson Med 55 (2006) 85-91] tends to be associated with prohibitively long reconstruction times. The goal of the present work was to develop a retrospectively gated cardiac cine method that features both parallel imaging and temporal acceleration, capable of achieving significant acceleration factors on commonly available hardware and associated with reconstruction times short enough for practical use in a clinical context. Seven cardiac patients and a healthy volunteer were recruited and imaged, with acceleration factors of 3.5 or 4.5, using an eight-channel product cardiac array on a 1.5-T system. The prescribed FOV value proved slightly too small in three patients, and one of the patients had a bigemini condition. Despite these additional challenges, good-quality results were obtained for all slices and all patients, with a reconstruction time of 0.98±0.07 s per frame, or about 20 s for a 20-frame slice, using a single processor on a single PC. As compared to using parallel imaging by itself, the addition of a temporal acceleration strategy provided much resistance to artifacts.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsCase-Control StudiesHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardiumSoftwareTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21398063
PMCPMC3079346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.