Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21396760›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2011

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in adult hemodialysis patients.

Bruce Y Lee, Randy M Stalter, Kristina M Bacon, Julie H Y Tai, Rachel R Bailey, Shanta M Zimmer, Michael M Wagner

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevention of influenza in healthy children.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruce Y LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Randy M Stalter
Kristina M Bacon
Julie H Y Tai
Rachel R Bailey
Shanta M Zimmer
Michael M Wagner
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Training, Outreach & Diversity ComponentU54GM088491 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VAN PANHUIS, WILLEM GIJSBERT · 2009 to 2018
$16.7M
Decision Making in BiosurveillanceR01LM009132 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WAGNER, MICHAEL MATTHEW · 2008 to 2011
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5U54GM088491-02NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088491NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM009132-03NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009132PHITPO CDC HHS 5P01HK000086-02PHITPO CDC HHS P01 HK000086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently more than 340,000 individuals are receiving long-term hemodialysis (HD) therapy for end-stage renal disease and therefore are particularly vulnerable to influenza, prone to more severe influenza outcomes, and less likely to achieve seroprotection from standard influenza vaccines. Influenza vaccine adjuvants, chemical or biologic compounds added to a vaccine to boost the elicited immunologic response, may help overcome this problem. STUDY

designEconomic stochastic decision analytic simulation model. SETTING &

participantsUS adult HD population. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME: The model simulated the decision to use either an adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted vaccine, assumed the societal perspective, and represented a single influenza season, or 1 year.

interventionAdjuvanted influenza vaccine at different adjuvant costs and efficacies. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of varying influenza clinical attack rate, influenza hospitalization rate, and influenza-related mortality. OUTCOMES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvanted influenza vaccine (vs nonadjuvanted) with effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years.

resultsAdjuvanted influenza vaccine would be cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year) at a $1 adjuvant cost (on top of the standard vaccine cost) when adjuvant efficacy (in overcoming the difference between influenza vaccine response in HD patients and healthy adults) ≥60% and economically dominant (provides both cost savings and health benefits) when the $1 adjuvant's efficacy is 100%. A $2 adjuvant would be cost-effective if adjuvant efficacy was 100%. LIMITATIONS: All models are simplifications of real life and cannot capture all possible factors and outcomes.

conclusionsAdjuvanted influenza vaccine with adjuvant cost ≤$2 could be a cost-effective strategy in a standard influenza season depending on the potency of the adjuvant.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21396760
PMCPMC3085888
OpenAlexW2081802189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.