Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21396152›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2012

The ethics of elective psychopharmacology.

Ahmed D Mohamed, Barbara J Sahakian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02051153 (Neurochemical Modulation Cognitive Performance and Subjective Wellbeing In Healthy Controls), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02051153 nacompletednot on this map

Neurochemical Modulation Cognitive Performance and Subjective Wellbeing In Healthy Controls

TypeinterventionalSponsorCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2009 to 2011Enrolled64ConditionsCognitive Performance, Creativity, Motivation, RewardArmsModafinil, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Psychonauts' World of Cognitive Enhancers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed D MohamedDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. adm67@cam.ac.uk
Barbara J Sahakian
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Wellcome Trust 019407Wellcome Trust 086041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological cognitive enhancers (PCEs) are used to improve cognitive functions, such as attention, learning, memory and planning in patients with impairments in cognition resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or from neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Moreover, PCEs have been shown to improve cognition in healthy volunteers with no psychiatric disorders. This article describes the rationale behind the need for their use in neuropsychiatric patients and illustrates how PCEs can ameliorate cognitive impairments, improve quality of life and wellbeing, and therefore reduce the economic burden associated with these disorders. We also describe evidence that PCEs are being used as cognitive enhancers by healthy people. Crucially, as the lifestyle use of these drugs becomes very popular in the healthy population, a final aim is to present an overview of the current and future neuroethical considerations of enhancing the healthy brain. As information regarding their actual use, benefits and harms in various healthy populations is currently lacking, we propose research that aims to obtain relevant empirical data, monitor the short- and long-term effectiveness and side-effects, and initiate accurate surveys to determine current patterns and quantity of usage of PCE drugs by healthy people. Furthermore, in order to instigate a dialogue between neuroethics and neuropsychopharmacology, we urge scientists to explore and communicate the social and ethical implications of their research to the public. Finally, we discuss and highlight other means of enhancing cognition in both patients and healthy adults, including education and physical exercise.

Indexed as

EthicsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCognitionHumansLife StyleNeurotransmitter AgentsPharmacogeneticsPsychopharmacologyCentral Nervous System StimulantsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID21396152
PMCPMC3325502
OpenAlexW2148085544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.