ArticleIntegrative zoology2007
Changes in attitudes toward wildlife and wildlife meats in Hunan Province, central China, before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak.
Article in Integrative zoology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human-animal interfaces and zoonotic disease risks in China: a review of contact behaviors and risk communication.Science in One Health · 2026Review
- China's Legal Protection System for Pangolins: Past, Present, and Future.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mammals at tourism destinations: a systematic review.Mammal review · 2021Review
- Chinese Public Attitudes towards, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Zoonotic Risk in Wildlife Trade, Southern China.EcoHealth · 2021Article
- Emerging Zoonotic Diseases: Should We Rethink the Animal-Human Interface?Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- A road for a promising future for China's primates: The potential for restoration.Zoological research · 2018Article
- Potential Pathogens Reported in Species of the Family Viverridae and Their Implications for Human and Animal Health.Zoonoses and public health · 2017Review
- Perception, Price and Preference: Consumption and Protection of Wild Animals Used in Traditional Medicine.PloS one · 2016Article
- When Nature turns cook: an epidemiological feast: report of the John Snow Society Pumphandle Lecture 2009, delivered by Dr David Heymann.Public health · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two surveys of opinions about wildlife conservation were carried out in Hunan Province, China, before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. Hunan is the northern neighbor of Guangdong Province, where the first SARS case was reported. The custom of consuming wild meat was not common in Hunan 30 years ago. However, in recent years, consumption of wildlife such as snakes has spread to northern China. We handed out 1300 questionnaires between 22 February and 10 May 2002, before the SARS epidemic. Survey sites included the provincial capital, major cities, towns, and villages in Hunan. Another 1300 questionnaires were distributed between 10 March and 10 May 2004, after the SARS epidemic. The 2004 survey covered the same sites as the 2002 survey. Questionnaire recovery rates for the 2002 and 2004 surveys were 81.2% and 84.6%, respectively. The valid return rate was 73.0%. Frog, snake, hare, and pheasant were the wild meats most frequently eaten by local people. At the time of the first survey, more than 80% of interviewees claimed to have eaten frogs. That number had reduced to 60% by the time of the second survey. Monkey, Chinese pangolin, and bear paw were the wild meats least frequently eaten. Although palm civet was suspected to be the carrier of SARS, it was interesting to note that, after the SARS epidemic, the proportion of people surveyed who ate palm civets had declined only slightly. The results of the surveys indicate a low level of conservation consciousness; however, after the SARS and bird flu epidemics, there were obvious changes in the conservation consciousness of people in Hunan Province. We recommend some measures that could be taken to change the habits of people who consume wildlife.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.