Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21395674›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2011

Perceived challenges and priorities in co-morbidity management of older patients with Type 2 diabetes.

E A Beverly, L A Wray, C J Chiu, K Weinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Oral Semaglutide.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E A BeverlyThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. elizabeth.beverly@joslin.harvard.edu
L A Wray
C J Chiu
K Weinger

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GERONTOLOGYT32AG000048 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI WILLIS, SHERRY L · 1985 to 2007
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000048NIA NIH HHS T32 AG00048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore older patients' perceived impact of chronic co-morbid conditions on Type 2 diabetes self-management.

methodsWe used purposive sampling to select 32 mentally alert community-dwelling adults, aged 60 years or older, diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and at least one other chronic health condition to participate in focus groups. We summarized the discussions following each focus group and identified codes to describe the overarching themes.

resultsWe conducted eight 90-min focus groups, each consisting of two to six patients. Three themes emerged. (i) Diabetes complications as a motivator: managing co-morbid conditions made health an important focal point in the lives of older patients. Most patients acknowledged the positive effect complications had on their diabetes self-management by motivating them to pay greater attention to their diabetes to diminish the progression of these complications. (ii) Prioritizing health conditions: patients reported prioritizing health conditions and selectively attending to the management of those conditions based on perceived severity or importance. Further, many patients perceived some conditions as more serious than others and admitted to prioritizing another health condition over their diabetes. (iii) Emotional impact of co-morbidity management: patients described feeling frustrated, confused, and overwhelmed in response to conflicting treatment recommendations, particularly for diet, physical activity and medication regimens.

conclusionsComplications and co-morbidities may have differential impacts on the diabetes self-management of older patients. Addressing the perceived impact of co-morbidity on diabetes self-management may improve patients' outcomes; however, the most effective method of utilizing this information in clinical practice needs to be examined.

Indexed as

AgedComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFocus GroupsGlycated HemoglobinHealth PrioritiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsSelf CareGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID21395674
PMCPMC4839190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.