Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21395363›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2011

Physiology of small-sided games training in football: a systematic review.

Stephen V Hill-Haas, Brian Dawson, Franco M Impellizzeri, Aaron J Coutts

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03970707 (Investigation on Recovery Kinetics After the Use of Small Sided Games With a Small and Large Number of Players and Large Pitch Area), which is not on this map. Cited by 252 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03970707 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Investigation on Recovery Kinetics After the Use of Small Sided Games With a Small and Large Number of Players and Large Pitch Area

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ThessalyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled10ConditionsSided Games in Soccer TrainingArmsSmall Number of Players training protocol A, Large Number of Players training protocol B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Comparative effectiveness of training interventions on VOBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Monitoring Accumulated Training and Match Load in Football: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Small-Sided Games as a Methodological Resource for Team Sports Teaching: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen V Hill-HaasSchool of Sports Science, Exercise & Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Brian Dawson
Franco M Impellizzeri
Aaron J Coutts

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-sided games (SSGs) are played on reduced pitch areas, often using modified rules and involving a smaller number of players than traditional football. These games are less structured than traditional fitness training methods but are very popular training drills for players of all ages and levels. At present, there is relatively little information regarding how SSGs can best be used to improve physical capacities and technical or tactical skills in footballers. However, many prescriptive variables controlled by the coach can influence the exercise intensity during SSGs. Coaches usually attempt to change the training stimulus in SSGs through altering the pitch area, player number, coach encouragement, training regimen (continuous vs interval training), rules and the use of goalkeepers. In general, it appears that SSG exercise intensity is increased with the concurrent reduction in player number and increase in relative pitch area per player. However, the inverse relationship between the number of players in each SSG and exercise intensity does not apply to the time-motion characteristics. Consistent coach encouragement can also increase training intensity, but most rule changes do not appear to strongly affect exercise intensity. The variation of exercise intensity measures are lower in smaller game formats (e.g. three vs three) and have acceptable reproducibility when the same game is repeated between different training sessions or within the same session. The variation in exercise intensity during SSGs can also be improved with consistent coach encouragement but it is still more variable than traditional generic training methods. Other studies have also shown that SSGs containing fewer players can exceed match intensity and elicit similar intensities to both long- and short-duration high-intensity interval running. It also appears that fitness and football-specific performance can be improved equally with SSG and generic training drills. Future research is required to examine the optimal periodization strategies of SSGs training for the long-term development of physiological capacity, technical skill and tactical proficiency.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceExerciseHumansPhysical FitnessSoccerTime and Motion Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.