Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21394201›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Vertebrate paralogous MEF2 genes: origin, conservation, and evolution.

Wenwu Wu, Stefan de Folter, Xia Shen, Wenqian Zhang, Shiheng Tao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of BovineGenes · 2023
    Article
  10. Gene Structure, Expression and Function Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evolution of Somite Compartmentalization: A View FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Common CarpGenes · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenwu WuCollege of Life Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Stefan de Folter
Xia Shen
Wenqian Zhang
Shiheng Tao
Northwest A&F University · CNCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) gene family is broadly expressed during the development and maintenance of muscle cells. Although a great deal has been elucidated concerning MEF2 transcription factors' regulation of specific gene expression in diverse programs and adaptive responses, little is known about the origin and evolution of the four members of the MEF2 gene family in vertebrates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsBy phylogenetic analyses, we investigated the origin, conservation, and evolution of the four MEF2 genes. First, among the four MEF2 paralogous branches, MEF2B is clearly distant from the other three branches in vertebrates, mainly because it lacks the HJURP_C (Holliday junction recognition protein C-terminal) region. Second, three duplication events might have occurred to produce the four MEF2 paralogous genes and the latest duplication event occurred near the origin of vertebrates producing MEF2A and MEF2C. Third, the ratio (K(a)/K(s)) of non-synonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitution rates showed that MEF2B evolves faster than the other three MEF2 proteins despite purifying selection on all of the four MEF2 branches. Moreover, a pair model of M0 versus M3 showed that variable selection exists among MEF2 proteins, and branch-site analysis presented that sites 53 and 64 along the MEF2B branch are under positive selection. Finally, and interestingly, substitution rates showed that type II MADS genes (i.e., MEF2-like genes) evolve as slowly as type I MADS genes (i.e., SRF-like genes) in animals, which is inconsistent with the fact that type II MADS genes evolve much slower than type I MADS genes in plants.

conclusionOur findings shed light on the relationship of MEF2A, B, C, and D with functional conservation and evolution in vertebrates. This study provides a rationale for future experimental design to investigate distinct but overlapping regulatory roles of the four MEF2 genes in various tissues.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSequence Homology, Amino AcidAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsConserved SequenceGenomeMADS Domain ProteinsMEF2 Transcription FactorsMiceModels, GeneticMyogenic Regulatory FactorsOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiarySelection, GeneticMADS Domain ProteinsMEF2 Transcription FactorsMyogenic Regulatory Factors

Identifiers

PMID21394201
PMCPMC3048864
OpenAlexW2050806368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.