ArticlePloS one2011
Vertebrate paralogous MEF2 genes: origin, conservation, and evolution.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diverse Roles of the MEF2 Transcription Factor Family in Tumor Progression and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Functional Analysis of the mstn1 Gene and Its Transcriptional Regulation by Mef2 Factors in Yellowfin Seabream, Acanthopagrus latus (Hottuyn, 1782).Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025Article
- Role of human Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 (MEF2) proteins in cancer: structural insights, functional diversity, and regulatory mechanisms.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Tissue-Specific Chromatin Accessibility Regions and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Pig Brain and Endocrine Tissues.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis Based on Functional Studies of MEF-2 Family in NSCLC.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Implications of vitamin D for flesh quality of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella): antioxidant ability, nutritional value, sensory quality, and myofiber characteristics.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effect of BovineGenes · 2023Article
- Gene Structure, Expression and Function Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of MEF2 Transcription Factor Family in Neuronal Survival and Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A spatiotemporal atlas of organogenesis in the development of orchid flowers.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Article
- Involvement of myocyte enhancer factor 2c in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder.Heliyon · 2021Review
- Evolution of Somite Compartmentalization: A View FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Common CarpGenes · 2019Article
- MEF-2 isoforms' (A-D) roles in development and tumorigenesis.Oncotarget · 2019Review
- Myogenic regulatory factors: The orchestrators of myogenesis after 30 years of discovery.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018Review
- Review
- Time course and side-by-side analysis of mesodermal, pre-myogenic, myogenic and differentiated cell markers in the chicken model for skeletal muscle formation.Journal of anatomy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) gene family is broadly expressed during the development and maintenance of muscle cells. Although a great deal has been elucidated concerning MEF2 transcription factors' regulation of specific gene expression in diverse programs and adaptive responses, little is known about the origin and evolution of the four members of the MEF2 gene family in vertebrates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsBy phylogenetic analyses, we investigated the origin, conservation, and evolution of the four MEF2 genes. First, among the four MEF2 paralogous branches, MEF2B is clearly distant from the other three branches in vertebrates, mainly because it lacks the HJURP_C (Holliday junction recognition protein C-terminal) region. Second, three duplication events might have occurred to produce the four MEF2 paralogous genes and the latest duplication event occurred near the origin of vertebrates producing MEF2A and MEF2C. Third, the ratio (K(a)/K(s)) of non-synonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitution rates showed that MEF2B evolves faster than the other three MEF2 proteins despite purifying selection on all of the four MEF2 branches. Moreover, a pair model of M0 versus M3 showed that variable selection exists among MEF2 proteins, and branch-site analysis presented that sites 53 and 64 along the MEF2B branch are under positive selection. Finally, and interestingly, substitution rates showed that type II MADS genes (i.e., MEF2-like genes) evolve as slowly as type I MADS genes (i.e., SRF-like genes) in animals, which is inconsistent with the fact that type II MADS genes evolve much slower than type I MADS genes in plants.
conclusionOur findings shed light on the relationship of MEF2A, B, C, and D with functional conservation and evolution in vertebrates. This study provides a rationale for future experimental design to investigate distinct but overlapping regulatory roles of the four MEF2 genes in various tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.