Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21393625›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2011

A CBPR partnership increases HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM): outcome findings from a pilot test of the CyBER/testing internet intervention.

Scott D Rhodes, Aaron T Vissman, Jason Stowers, Cindy Miller, Thomas P McCoy, Kenneth C Hergenrather, Aimee M Wilkin, Michael Reece, Laura H Bachmann, Addison Ore and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Crowdsourcing HIV Test Promotion Videos: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial in China.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Scott D RhodesDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA. srhodes@wfubmc.edu
Aaron T Vissman
Jason Stowers
Cindy Miller
Thomas P McCoy
Kenneth C Hergenrather
Aimee M Wilkin
Michael Reece
Laura H Bachmann
Addison Ore
Michael W Ross
Ellen Hendrix
Eugenia Eng

Funding

CBPR and the Internet: Increasing HIV Testing Through Chat Room-Based PromotionR21MH082689 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RHODES, SCOTT D · 2008 to 2009
$345k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH082689PHS HHS R21082689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet has emerged as an important tool for the delivery of health promotion and disease prevention interventions. Our community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership developed and piloted CyBER/testing, a culturally congruent intervention designed to promote HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) within existing Internet chat rooms. Using a quasi-experimental, single-group study design, cross-sectional data were collected from chat room participants, known as "chatters," at pretest (n = 346) and posttest (n = 315). Extant profile data also were collected to describe the demographics of the online population. The intervention significantly increased self-reported HIV testing among chatters overall, increasing rates from 44.5% at pretest to nearly 60% at posttest (p < .001). Furthermore, chatters who reported having both male and female sexual partners had nearly 6 times the odds of reporting HIV testing at posttest. Findings suggest that chat room-based HIV testing intervention may increase testing among MSM who may be difficult to reach in traditional physical spaces.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAIDS SerodiagnosisBisexualityCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCultural CompetencyFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID21393625
PMCPMC3282160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.