ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2011
Pharmacological activation of p53 in cancer cells.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutri-PEITC Jelly Significantly Improves Progression-Free Survival and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Trial
- Targeting p53-p21 signaling to enhance mesenchymal stem cell regenerative potential.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- HS-1793 inhibits cell proliferation in lung cancer by interfering with the interaction between p53 and MDM2.Oncology letters · 2022Article
- Differential p53-Mediated Cellular Responses to DNA-Damaging Therapeutic Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Effect of COL4A1 Expression on the Survival of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Cancer Patients.Journal of oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Chemical Variations on the p53 Reactivation Theme.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Activation of anaphase-promoting complex by p53 induces a state of dormancy in cancer cells against chemotherapeutic stress.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- ATM/CHK/p53 Pathway Dependent Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Activity on Lung Cancer by Pterostilbene.PloS one · 2016Article
- Transducer of ERBB2.1 (TOB1) as a Tumor Suppressor: A Mechanistic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Cordyceps militaris (L.) Link Fruiting Body Reduces the Growth of a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Line by Increasing Cellular Levels of p53 and p21.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- TP53 transcription factor for the NEDD9/HEF1/Cas-L gene: potential targets in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer treatment.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- p53 modulates Hsp90 ATPase activity and regulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014Article
- AMPK activation--protean potential for boosting healthspan.Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014Review
- p53 protein regulates Hsp90 ATPase activity and thereby Wnt signaling by modulating Aha1 expression.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Erb-041, an estrogen receptor-β agonist, inhibits skin photocarcinogenesis in SKH-1 hairless mice by downregulating the WNT signaling pathway.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014Article
- Heritable one-hit events defining cancer prevention?Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013Article
- Senescent cells and their secretory phenotype as targets for cancer therapy.Interdisciplinary topics in gerontology · 2013Review
- Tob1 induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by activating Smad4 and inhibiting β‑catenin signaling.International journal of oncology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that regulates a large number of genes and guards against genomic instability. Under multiple cellular stress conditions, p53 functions to block cell cycle progression transiently unless proper DNA repair occurs. Failure of DNA repair mechanisms leads to p53-mediated induction of cell death programs. p53 also induces permanent cell cycle arrest known as cellular senescence. During neoplastic progression, p53 is often mutated and fails to efficiently perform these functions. It has been observed that cancers carrying a wild-type p53 may also have interrupted downstream p53 regulatory signaling leading to disruption in p53 functions. Therefore, strategies to reactivate p53 provide an attractive approach for blocking tumor pathogenesis and its progression. p53 activation may also lead to regression of existing early neoplastic lesions and therefore may be important in developing cancer chemoprevention protocols. A large number of small molecules capable of reactivating p53 have been developed and some are progressing through clinical trials for prospective human applications. However, several questions remain to be answered at this stage. For example, it is not certain if pharmacological activation of p53 will restore all of its multifaceted biological responses, assuming that the targeted cell is not killed following p53 activation. It remains to be demonstrated whether the distinct biological effects regulated by specific post-translationally modified p53 can effectively be restored by refolding mutant p53. Mutant p53 can be classified as a loss-of-function or gain-of-function protein depending on the type of mutation. It is also unclear whether reactivation of mutant p53 has similar consequences in cells carrying gain-of-function and loss-of-function p53 mutants. This review provides a description of various pharmacological approaches tested to activate p53 (both wild-type and mutant) and to assess the effects of activated p53 on neoplastic progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.