Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21391904›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2011

Pharmacological activation of p53 in cancer cells.

Mohammad Athar, Craig A Elmets, Levy Kopelovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical Variations on the p53 Reactivation Theme.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Heritable one-hit events defining cancer prevention?Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AtharDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Volker Hall, Room 509, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0019, USA. mathar@uab.edu
Craig A Elmets
Levy Kopelovich
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

UAB Skin Diseases Research CenterP30AR050948 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ELMETS, CRAIG A · 2004 to 2013
$5.5M
Role of p53 and ptc tumor suppressive pathways in BCCs development and preventionR01ES015323 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ATHAR, MOHAMMAD · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
Inhibiting Multiple Molecular Targets for Preventing Non-Melanoma Skin CancerR01CA138998 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ATHAR, MOHAMMAD · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Developing a murine model for arsenic-induced skin neoplasmR21ES017494 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ATHAR, MOHAMMAD · 2009 to 2010
$401k
Chemo-prevention of UVB-induced Basal Cell Carcinomas+/*R03CA101061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ATHAR, MOHAMMAD · 2003 to 2004
$164k
NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-43300NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138998NCI NIH HHS R03 CA101061NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR050948NIAMS NIH HHS P30AR050948NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015323NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES017494NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES017494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that regulates a large number of genes and guards against genomic instability. Under multiple cellular stress conditions, p53 functions to block cell cycle progression transiently unless proper DNA repair occurs. Failure of DNA repair mechanisms leads to p53-mediated induction of cell death programs. p53 also induces permanent cell cycle arrest known as cellular senescence. During neoplastic progression, p53 is often mutated and fails to efficiently perform these functions. It has been observed that cancers carrying a wild-type p53 may also have interrupted downstream p53 regulatory signaling leading to disruption in p53 functions. Therefore, strategies to reactivate p53 provide an attractive approach for blocking tumor pathogenesis and its progression. p53 activation may also lead to regression of existing early neoplastic lesions and therefore may be important in developing cancer chemoprevention protocols. A large number of small molecules capable of reactivating p53 have been developed and some are progressing through clinical trials for prospective human applications. However, several questions remain to be answered at this stage. For example, it is not certain if pharmacological activation of p53 will restore all of its multifaceted biological responses, assuming that the targeted cell is not killed following p53 activation. It remains to be demonstrated whether the distinct biological effects regulated by specific post-translationally modified p53 can effectively be restored by refolding mutant p53. Mutant p53 can be classified as a loss-of-function or gain-of-function protein depending on the type of mutation. It is also unclear whether reactivation of mutant p53 has similar consequences in cells carrying gain-of-function and loss-of-function p53 mutants. This review provides a description of various pharmacological approaches tested to activate p53 (both wild-type and mutant) and to assess the effects of activated p53 on neoplastic progression.

Indexed as

Genes, p53Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMutationNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID21391904
PMCPMC3780581
OpenAlexW2059399904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.