ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Current trends in nanobiosensor technology.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Biomedical applications of graphene-based nanomaterials: recent progress, challenges, and prospects in highly sensitive biosensors.Discover nano · 2024Review
- Nanotechnological Interventions in Agriculture.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Properties and Applications of Graphene and Its Derivatives in Biosensors for Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Nanotechnology: A Potential Weapon to Fight against COVID-19.Particle & particle systems characterization : measurement and description of particle properties and behavior in powders and other disperse systems · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Aptasensor for Cytokine Detection: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Insights on functionalized carbon nanotubes for cancer theranostics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
- Nanoparticle approaches against SARS-CoV-2 infection.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2021Article
- Biomolecular interactions with nanoparticles: applications for coronavirus disease 2019.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2021Review
- Elucidating the Quenching Mechanism in Carbon Dot-Metal Interactions-Designing Sensitive and Selective Optical Probes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Pathogenic Virus Detection by Optical Nanobiosensors.Cell reports. Physical science · 2021Review
- Gold Nanorod Integrated Electrochemical Sensing for Hyperglycaemia on Interdigitated Electrode.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Food Safety Analysis Using Electrochemical Biosensors.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Nanomaterial-based biosensors for detection of pathogenic virus.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2017Review
- Plasmon-Coupled Whispering Gallery Modes on Nanodisk Arrays for Signal Enhancements.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Noble metal nanoparticles in biosensors: recent studies and applications.Nanotechnology reviews · 2017Article
- A biofunctionalizable ink platform composed of catechol-modified chitosan and reduced graphene oxide/platinum nanocomposite.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017Article
- Use of Charged Nanoparticles in NMR-Based Metabolomics for Spectral Simplification and Improved Metabolite Identification.Analytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2015Review
- Development of nanoscale approaches for ovarian cancer therapeutics and diagnostics.Critical reviews in oncogenesis · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of tools and processes used to fabricate, measure, and image nanoscale objects has lead to a wide range of work devoted to producing sensors that interact with extremely small numbers (or an extremely small concentration) of analyte molecules. These advances are particularly exciting in the context of biosensing, where the demands for low concentration detection and high specificity are great. Nanoscale biosensors, or nanobiosensors, provide researchers with an unprecedented level of sensitivity, often to the single molecule level. The use of biomolecule-functionalized surfaces can dramatically boost the specificity of the detection system, but can also yield reproducibility problems and increased complexity. Several nanobiosensor architectures based on mechanical devices, optical resonators, functionalized nanoparticles, nanowires, nanotubes, and nanofibers have been demonstrated in the lab. As nanobiosensor technology becomes more refined and reliable, it is likely it will eventually make its way from the lab to the clinic, where future lab-on-a-chip devices incorporating an array of nanobiosensors could be used for rapid screening of a wide variety of analytes at low cost using small samples of patient material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.