Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21390544›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2011

Matrix control of scarring.

Cecelia C Yates, Richard Bodnar, Alan Wells

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ECM-regulation of autophagy: The yin and the yang of autophagy during wound healing.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin tissue repair: Matrix microenvironmental influences.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cecelia C YatesDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Richard Bodnar
Alan Wells

Funding

Spatial Segregation of Cell Functioning During MotilityR01GM069668 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2004 to 2019
$4.7M
Dermal-Epidermal Communication during Wound HealingR01GM063569 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2003 to 2018
$3.7M
Perfused 3D Tissue Surrogates for Complex Cell-Cell Communication SystemsR01EB010246 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFITH, LINDA G · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Dermal-Epidermal Communication during Wound HealingR56GM063569 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2008 to 2008
$341k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010246NIGMS NIH HHS GM063569NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063569NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069668NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM063569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repair of wounds usually results in restoration of organ function, even if suboptimal. However, in a minority of situations, the healing process leads to significant scarring that hampers homeostasis and leaves the tissue compromised. This scar is characterized by an excess of matrix deposition that remains poorly organized and weakened. While we know much of the early stages of the repair process, the transition to wound resolution that limits scar formation is poorly understood. This is particularly true of the inducers of scar formation. Here, we present a hypothesis that it is the matrix itself that is a primary driver of scar, rather than being simply the result of other cellular dysregulations.

Indexed as

CicatrixWound HealingExtracellular MatrixHumansReceptors, CXCR3CXCR3 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR3

Identifiers

PMID21390544
PMCPMC3764457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.