Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21390217›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Expanding the versatility of phage display I: efficient display of peptide-tags on protein VII of the filamentous phage.

Geir Åge Løset, Bjarne Bogen, Inger Sandlie

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Preparation of Bioconjugates of Chimeric M13 Phage and Gold Nanorods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Naïve Human Antibody Libraries for Infectious Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geir Åge LøsetCentre for Immune Regulation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. g.a.loset@imbv.uio.no
Bjarne Bogen
Inger Sandlie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhage display is a platform for selection of specific binding molecules and this is a clear-cut motivation for increasing its performance. Polypeptides are normally displayed as fusions to the major coat protein VIII (pVIII), or the minor coat protein III (pIII). Display on other coat proteins such as pVII allows for display of heterologous peptide sequences on the virions in addition to those displayed on pIII and pVIII. In addition, pVII display is an alternative to pIII or pVIII display. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHere we demonstrate how standard pIII or pVIII display phagemids are complemented with a helper phage which supports production of virions that are tagged with octa FLAG, HIS(6) or AviTag on pVII. The periplasmic signal sequence required for pIII and pVIII display, and which has been added to pVII in earlier studies, is omitted altogether. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Tagging on pVII is an important and very useful add-on feature to standard pIII and pVII display. Any phagemid bearing a protein of interest on either pIII or pVIII can be tagged with any of the tags depending simply on choice of helper phage. We show in this paper how such tags may be utilized for immobilization and separation as well as purification and detection of monoclonal and polyclonal phage populations.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAmino Acid SequenceBacteriophage M13Base SequenceCapsid ProteinsCloning, MolecularEfficiencyInovirusMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCapsid ProteinsPeptide LibraryPeptidesProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21390217
PMCPMC3044727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.