Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21390125›Full record

ArticleNature2011

Wiring specificity in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina.

Kevin L Briggman, Moritz Helmstaedter, Winfried Denk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 487 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
487citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

487 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Approaching a connectome of the human foveal retina.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Connectome of a human foveal retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

427 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin L BriggmanMax Planck Institute for Medical Research, Department of Biomedical Optics, Heidelberg 69120, Germany. briggman@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de
Moritz Helmstaedter
Winfried Denk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper connectivity between neurons is essential for the implementation of the algorithms used in neural computations, such as the detection of directed motion by the retina. The analysis of neuronal connectivity is possible with electron microscopy, but technological limitations have impeded the acquisition of high-resolution data on a large enough scale. Here we show, using serial block-face electron microscopy and two-photon calcium imaging, that the dendrites of mouse starburst amacrine cells make highly specific synapses with direction-selective ganglion cells depending on the ganglion cell's preferred direction. Our findings indicate that a structural (wiring) asymmetry contributes to the computation of direction selectivity. The nature of this asymmetry supports some models of direction selectivity and rules out others. It also puts constraints on the developmental mechanisms behind the formation of synaptic connections. Our study demonstrates how otherwise intractable neurobiological questions can be addressed by combining functional imaging with the analysis of neuronal connectivity using large-scale electron microscopy.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsCalcium SignalingDendritesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID21390125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.