ArticleNature2011
Biobanks need publicity.
Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biobanking knowledge and donation willingness among musculoskeletal patients in England: a multisite cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Public awareness, attitudes, and motivation toward biobanks: a survey of China.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals and scientists' collaboration with biobanks: a pilot study on the assessment of knowledge and attitudes toward biospecimen donation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- To donate or not to donate? Future healthcare professionals' opinions on biobanking of human biological material for research purposes.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Perceptions, attitudes, and willingness of the public in low- and middle-income countries of the Arab region to participate in biobank research.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- National Center Biobank Network.Human genome variation · 2022Review
- Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Public awareness and attitudes toward biobank and sample donation: A regional Chinese survey.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- A review of big data and medical research.SAGE open medicine · 2020Review
- Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Questioning the rhetoric of a 'willing population' in Finnish biobanking.Life sciences, society and policy · 2019Article
- [The current ethical and legal framework for human biobanks].Der Pathologe · 2018Review
- The RD-Connect Registry & Biobank Finder: a tool for sharing aggregated data and metadata among rare disease researchers.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- The Public's Awareness of and Attitude Toward Research Biobanks - A Regional German Survey.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Overview of the BioBank Japan Project: Study design and profile.Journal of epidemiology · 2017Review
- Needs and Requirements of Modern Biobanks on the Example of Dystonia Syndromes.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Generation and validation of a universal perinatal database and biospecimen repository: PeriBank.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016Article
- International biobanks: do or do not?Future science OA · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21390108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.