Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21389249›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2011

Update on medications with adverse skeletal effects.

Caroline J Davidge Pitts, Ann E Kearns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors associated with fractures?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Skeletal manifestations of treatment of breast cancer.Current osteoporosis reports · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline J Davidge PittsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ann E Kearns

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients rely on their primary care physician to manage multiple, often chronic medical conditions that require prescription medications. Balancing the risk to benefit of treatments can be challenging and requires that the primary care physician stay abreast of new information regarding risks and benefits. The number of medications with reported adverse effects on skeletal health is expanding. This review focuses on medications recently added to the list of "bad to the bone" drugs and on recent advances in management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. A practical approach to assessing and managing the skeletal risks is outlined.

Indexed as

AnimalsAromatase InhibitorsBone and BonesBone DensityBreast NeoplasmsContraceptive Agents, FemaleDiphosphonatesFractures, BoneGlucocorticoidsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateOsteoporosisPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsProton Pump InhibitorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAromatase InhibitorsContraceptive Agents, FemaleDiphosphonatesGlucocorticoidsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneMedroxyprogesterone AcetatePeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsProton Pump InhibitorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID21389249
PMCPMC3068894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.