Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21389222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Experimental protocols alter phototransduction: the implications for retinal processing at visual threshold.

Anthony W Azevedo, Fred Rieke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. S-cone-specific circuitry in the outer plexiform layer of a cone-dominant mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Light responses of mammalian cones.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Light responses of primate and other mammalian cones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony W AzevedoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Fred Rieke

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF SINGLE PHOTON DETECTIONR01EY011850 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Allosteric Coupling in Homomeric Cys-loop ReceptorsR01NS053521 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SINE, STEVEN M · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011850NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270NINDS NIH HHS NS053521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision in dim light, when photons are scarce, requires reliable signaling of the arrival of single photons. Rod photoreceptors accomplish this task through the use of a G-protein-coupled transduction cascade that amplifies the activity of single active rhodopsin molecules. This process is one of the best understood signaling cascades in biology, yet quantitative measurements of the amplitude and kinetics of the rod's response in mice vary by a factor of ∼ 2 across studies. What accounts for these discrepancies? We used several experimental approaches to reconcile differences in published properties of rod responses. First, we used suction electrode recordings from single rods to compare measurements across a range of recording conditions. Second, we compared measurements of single-cell photocurrents to estimates of rod function from in vitro electroretinograms. Third, we assayed the health of the post-receptor retinal tissue in these different conditions. Several salient points emerge from these experiments: (1) recorded responses can be altered dramatically by how the retina is stored; (2) the kinetics of the recovery of responses to bright but not dim flashes are strongly sensitive to the extracellular concentration of magnesium; (3) experimental conditions that produce very different single-photon responses measured in single rods produce near identical derived rod responses from the electroretinogram. The dependence of rod responses on experimental conditions will be a key consideration in efforts to extract general principles of G-protein signaling from studies of phototransduction and to relate these signals to downstream mechanisms that facilitate visual sensitivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectrophysiologyElectroretinographyFemaleMagnesiumMicePhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsSignal TransductionVision, OcularMagnesium

Identifiers

PMID21389222
PMCPMC3063123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.