ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011
A bioinformatics workflow for variant peptide detection in shotgun proteomics.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- pAnno: a comprehensive, precise, and fast proteogenomic workflow for the discovery of novel coding regions.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Uncovering dark mass in population proteomics: Pan-analysis of single amino acid polymorphism relevant to cognition and aging.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Moving Toward Metaproteogenomics: A Computational Perspective on Analyzing Microbial Samples via Proteogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics - catching the (un)usual suspects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Enhancing Missense Variant Pathogenicity Prediction with MissenseNet: Integrating Structural Insights and ShuffleNet-Based Deep Learning Techniques.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Pangenomic analysis of Chinese gastric cancer.Nature communications · 2022Article
- An analysis of proteogenomics and how and when transcriptome-informed reduction of protein databases can enhance eukaryotic proteomics.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Prediction of disease-associated nsSNPs by integrating multi-scale ResNet models with deep feature fusion.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- The structure-based cancer-related single amino acid variation prediction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Personalized Proteome: Comparing Proteogenomics and Open Variant Search Approaches for Single Amino Acid Variant Detection.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Empowering Shotgun Mass Spectrometry with 2DE: A HepG2 Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Transfer posterior error probability estimation for peptide identification.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- PepQuery enables fast, accurate, and convenient proteomic validation of novel genomic alterations.Genome research · 2019Article
- Identification of TEX101-associated Proteins Through Proteomic Measurement of Human Spermatozoa Homozygous for the Missense Variant rs35033974.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Single Amino Acid Variant Discovery in Small Numbers of Cells.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Discovery of coding regions in the human genome by integrated proteogenomics analysis workflow.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Detecting protein variants by mass spectrometry: a comprehensive study in cancer cell-lines.Genome medicine · 2017Article
- CanProVar 2.0: An Updated Database of Human Cancer Proteome Variation.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
- Single Amino Acid Variant Profiles of Subpopulations in the MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Line.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
- dbSAP: single amino-acid polymorphism database for protein variation detection.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shotgun proteomics data analysis usually relies on database search. However, commonly used protein sequence databases do not contain information on protein variants and thus prevent variant peptides and proteins from been identified. Including known coding variations into protein sequence databases could help alleviate this problem. Based on our recently published human Cancer Proteome Variation Database, we have created a protein sequence database that comprehensively annotates thousands of cancer-related coding variants collected in the Cancer Proteome Variation Database as well as noncancer-specific ones from the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database (dbSNP). Using this database, we then developed a data analysis workflow for variant peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. The high risk of false positive variant identifications was addressed by a modified false discovery rate estimation method. Analysis of colorectal cancer cell lines SW480, RKO, and HCT-116 revealed a total of 81 peptides that contain either noncancer-specific or cancer-related variations. Twenty-three out of 26 variants randomly selected from the 81 were confirmed by genomic sequencing. We further applied the workflow on data sets from three individual colorectal tumor specimens. A total of 204 distinct variant peptides were detected, and five carried known cancer-related mutations. Each individual showed a specific pattern of cancer-related mutations, suggesting potential use of this type of information for personalized medicine. Compatibility of the workflow has been tested with four popular database search engines including Sequest, Mascot, X!Tandem, and MyriMatch. In summary, we have developed a workflow that effectively uses existing genomic data to enable variant peptide detection in proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.