Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21388771›Full record

GuidelineJournal of the American College of Cardiology2011

Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.

Lori Mosca, Emelia J Benjamin, Kathy Berra, Judy L Bezanson, Rowena J Dolor, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, L Kristin Newby, Ileana L Piña, Véronique L Roger, Leslee J Shaw and 28 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 331 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
331citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

331 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring sex bias in cardiometabolic diseases.Lipids in health and disease · 2026
    Review

271 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Lori MoscaAmerican Heart Association, USA.
Emelia J Benjamin
Kathy Berra
Judy L Bezanson
Rowena J Dolor
Donald M Lloyd-Jones
L Kristin Newby
Ileana L Piña
Véronique L Roger
Leslee J Shaw
Dong Zhao
Theresa M Beckie
Cheryl Bushnell
Jeanine D'Armiento
Penny M Kris-Etherton
Jing Fang
Theodore G Ganiats
Antoinette S Gomes
Clarisa R Gracia
Constance K Haan
Elizabeth A Jackson
Debra R Judelson
Ellie Kelepouris
Carl J Lavie
Anne Moore
Nancy A Nussmeier
Elizabeth Ofili
Suzanne Oparil
Pamela Ouyang
Vivian W Pinn
Katherine Sherif
Sidney C Smith
George Sopko
Nisha Chandra-Strobos
Elaine M Urbina
Viola Vaccarino
Nanette K Wenger
American Heart Association

Funding

Gender Race and Ethnic Disparities Research in Cardiovascular Disease PreventionK24HL076346 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOSCA, LORI J · 2005 to 2014
$1.7M
Sex Differences in Vascular Markers of Stroke RiskK02NS058760 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BUSHNELL, CHERYL D · 2008 to 2012
$788k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL076346NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS058760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAmerican Heart AssociationAtrial FibrillationCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityFemaleGuideline AdherenceHeart FailureHispanic or LatinoHumansLife StylePatient Education as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID21388771
PMCPMC3124072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.