Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21387340›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2011

Extending fragment-based free energy calculations with library Monte Carlo simulation: annealing in interaction space.

Steven Lettieri, Artem B Mamonov, Daniel M Zuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven LettieriDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
Artem B Mamonov
Daniel M Zuckerman

Funding

Fast Computations for Structural Transitions in ProteinsR01GM070987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZUCKERMAN, DANIEL M · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
Toward Practical, Rigorous Binding Affinity CalculationsR01GM076569 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZUCKERMAN, DANIEL M · 2007 to 2011
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070987NIGMS NIH HHS GM076569NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070987NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-calculated libraries of molecular fragment configurations have previously been used as a basis for both equilibrium sampling (via library-based Monte Carlo) and for obtaining absolute free energies using a polymer-growth formalism. Here, we combine the two approaches to extend the size of systems for which free energies can be calculated. We study a series of all-atom poly-alanine systems in a simple dielectric solvent and find that precise free energies can be obtained rapidly. For instance, for 12 residues, less than an hour of single-processor time is required. The combined approach is formally equivalent to the annealed importance sampling algorithm; instead of annealing by decreasing temperature, however, interactions among fragments are gradually added as the molecule is grown. We discuss implications for future binding affinity calculations in which a ligand is grown into a binding site.

Indexed as

Quantum TheoryAlgorithmsBinding SitesLigandsMonte Carlo MethodPeptidesTemperatureLigandsPeptidespolyalanine

Identifiers

PMID21387340
PMCPMC3390976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.