Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21387289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2012

Comparison of visual inspection with acetic acid and cervical cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia among HIV-infected women in India.

Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe, Ramesh A Bhosale, Anita N Kavatkar, Chandraprabha A Nagwanshi, Smita N Joshi, Cathy A Jenkins, Bryan E Shepherd, Rohini S Kelkar, Seema Sahay, Arun R Risbud and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Women in India: Why, When and How?Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Study of Pap Smear in HIV-Positive Females.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on prevention and screening of cervical cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vikrant V SahasrabuddheVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. vikrant.sahasrabuddhe@vanderbilt.edu
Ramesh A Bhosale
Anita N Kavatkar
Chandraprabha A Nagwanshi
Smita N Joshi
Cathy A Jenkins
Bryan E Shepherd
Rohini S Kelkar
Seema Sahay
Arun R Risbud
Sten H Vermund
Sanjay M Mehendale
B. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INNational AIDS Research Institute · INVanderbilt University · USNational Institute of Epidemiology · INTata Memorial Hospital · INVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

Vanderbilt University-CIDRZ AIDS International Training and Research ProgramD43TW001035 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 1998 to 2014
$10.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women in India and other developing country settings are living longer on antiretroviral therapy, yet their risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cervical cancer remains unabated because of lack of cost-effective and accurate secondary prevention methods. Visual inspection after application of dilute acetic acid on the cervix (VIA) has not been adequately studied against the current standard: conventional cervical cytology (Pap smears) among HIV-infected women. We evaluated 303 nonpregnant HIV-infected women in Pune, India, by simultaneous and independent screening with VIA and cervical cytology with disease ascertainment by colposcopy and histopathology. At the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) disease threshold, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value estimates of VIA were 80, 82.6, 47.6 and 95.4% respectively, compared to 60.5, 59.6, 22.4 and 88.7% for the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or severe (ASCUS+) cutoff on cytology, 60.5, 64.6, 24.8 and 89.4% for the low-grade squamous intraepithelial cells or severe (LSIL+) cutoff on cytology and 20.9, 96.0, 50.0 and 86.3% for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or severe (HSIL+) cutoff on cytology. A similar pattern of results was found for women with the presence of carcinogenic HPV-positive CIN2+ disease, as well as for women with CD4+ cell counts <200 and <350 μL(-1) . Overall, VIA performed better than cytology in this study with biologically rigorous endpoints and without verification bias, suggesting that VIA is a practical and useful alternative or adjunctive screening test for HIV-infected women. Implementing VIA-based screening within HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome care programs may provide an easy and practical means of complementing the highly anticipated low-cost HPV-based rapid screening tests in the near future, thereby contributing to improve program effectiveness of screening.

Indexed as

AcetatesCytodiagnosisAdultCervix UteriColposcopyCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, ViralFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsAcetatesDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID21387289
PMCPMC3516675
OpenAlexW1970713769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.