Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21386841›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2011

Phase II study of single agent capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

L Medley, A N Morel, D Farrugia, N Reed, N Hayward, J M Davies, O Kirichek, R V Thakker, D C Talbot

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Progress in the Treatment of Small Intestine Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  8. Medical Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L MedleyUniversity Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington OX3 7LJ, UK.
A N Morel
D Farrugia
N Reed
N Hayward
J M Davies
O Kirichek
R V Thakker
D C Talbot
Churchill Hospital · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCheltenham General Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G1000467Medical Research Council G9825289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to determine the safety of single agent capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5FU, in patients with metastatic non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

methodsMulticentre phase II, first-line study design. Oral capecitabine was administered on days 1-14 of 3-week cycles.

resultsTreatment was safe and well tolerated. Common toxicities were diarrhoea and fatigue.

conclusionThe study provides evidence to support the use of capecitabine as a substitute for infusional 5FU in the management of NETs.

Indexed as

AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID21386841
PMCPMC3068509
OpenAlexW1993232904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.