Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21386796›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2011

Unresolved issues in biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Ronald F van Vollenhoven

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Basic Mechanisms of JAK Inhibition.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Novel mechanisms of action of the biologicals in rheumatic diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  10. Subjective health expectations at biological therapy initiation: a survey of rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. First face-off in RA biologic therapy declared a draw.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald F van VollenhovenUnit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases, The Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. ronald.van.vollenhoven@ki.se

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of biologic therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has radically changed this therapeutic area. The currently available biologic agents have been studied extensively as part of their development and also during their subsequent years of use in clinical practice; as a result, the knowledge base regarding these therapeutics is very large. Nonetheless, a number of important questions remain and some key issues are still incompletely understood. In this Review, I discuss a number of these unresolved issues, including: the correct placement of biologic therapies in the long-term evolution of the RA disease process, and the expectations associated with such use; comparisons of therapeutic strategies that include conventional as well as biologic agents; optimal dosing of biologic agents; the elusive goal of personalized therapy; and an appraisal of the real impact of biologic therapy on patients' lives. It is concluded that, despite these unresolved issues, important progress has been made and many additional advances in our understanding can be expected during the coming years.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalArthritis, RheumatoidEarly DiagnosisHumansImmunologic FactorsSickness Impact ProfileAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.