Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21386097›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2011

Assessment of dental fluorosis in Mmp20 +/- mice.

R Sharma, C E Tye, A Arun, D MacDonald, A Chatterjee, T Abrazinski, E T Everett, G M Whitford, J D Bartlett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tooth Enamel and its Dynamic Protein Matrix.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R SharmaDepartment of Cytokine Biology, The Forsyth Institute, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
C E Tye
A Arun
D MacDonald
A Chatterjee
T Abrazinski
E T Everett
G M Whitford
J D Bartlett
Augusta University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Enamelysin Processing Mechanisms in AmelogenesisR01DE016276 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2006 to 2014
$4.4M
THE ROLE OF STRESS AND PH IN FLUOROSISR01DE018106 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2009 to 2016
$3.8M
Genetic Determinants of Physiological Responses to Fluoride in BoneR01DE018104 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVERETT, ERIC T. · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
Enamelysin Processing Mechanisms in AmelogenesisR56DE016276 · NIDCR · ADA FORSYTH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2011 to 2011
$498k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE018104NIDCR NIH HHS DE018106NIDCR NIH HHS DE16276NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016276NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018104NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018106NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE016276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms that underlie dental fluorosis are poorly understood. The retention of enamel proteins hallmarking fluorotic enamel may result from impaired hydrolysis and/or removal of enamel proteins. Previous studies have suggested that partial inhibition of Mmp20 expression is involved in the etiology of dental fluorosis. Here we ask if mice expressing only one functional Mmp20 allele are more susceptible to fluorosis. We demonstrate that Mmp20 (+/-) mice express approximately half the amount of MMP20 as do wild-type mice. The Mmp20 heterozygous mice have normal-appearing enamel, with Vickers microhardness values similar to those of wild-type control enamel. Therefore, reduced MMP20 expression is not solely responsible for dental fluorosis. With 50-ppm-fluoride (F(-)) treatment ad libitum, the Mmp20 (+/-) mice had F(-) tissue levels similar to those of Mmp20 (+/+) mice. No significant difference in enamel hardness was observed between the F(-)-treated heterozygous and wild-type mice. Interestingly, we did find a small but significant difference in quantitative fluorescence between these two groups, which may be attributable to slightly higher protein content in the Mmp20 (+/-) mouse enamel. We conclude that MMP20 plays a nominal role in dental enamel fluorosis.

Indexed as

AmelogenesisAnimalsDental EnamelDental Enamel ProteinsEnamel OrganFluorescenceFluoridesFluorosis, DentalGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHardnessHeterozygoteHomozygoteMatrix Metalloproteinase 20MiceMice, Inbred C57BLDental Enamel ProteinsFluoridesMatrix Metalloproteinase 20

Identifiers

PMID21386097
PMCPMC3092810
OpenAlexW2076739001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.