Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21385723›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Bayesian multiple quantitative trait loci mapping for recombinant inbred intercrosses.

Zhongshang Yuan, Fei Zou, Yanyan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhongshang YuanSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fei Zou
Yanyan Liu

Funding

An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50MH090338 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2009 to 2010
$6.0M
STATISTICAL METHODS IN CURRENT CANCER RESEARCHR01CA082659 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2000 to 2016
$3.7M
Robust Methods for Complex Trait Mapping with Collaborative CrossR01GM074175 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZOU, FEI · 2006 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082659NCI NIH HHS R01CA082659NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074175NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM074175NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090338NIMH NIH HHS P50MH090338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a renewable mouse resource that mimics the genetic diversity in humans. The recombinant inbred intercrosses (RIX) generated from CC recombinant inbred (RI) lines share similar genetic structures to those of F(2) individuals. In contrast to F(2) mice, genotypes of RIX can be inferred from the genotypes of their RI parents and can be produced repeatedly. Also, RIX mice do not typically share the same degree of relatedness. This unbalanced genetic relatedness requires careful statistical modeling to avoid a large number of false positive findings. For complex traits, mapping multiple genes simultaneously is arguably more powerful than mapping one gene at a time. In this article, we describe how we have developed a Bayesian quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping method that simultaneously deals with the special genetic architecture of RIX and maps multiple genes. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated by extensive simulations. In addition, for a given set of RI lines, there are numerous ways to generate RIX samples. To provide a general guideline on future RIX studies, we compare several RIX designs through simulations.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCrosses, GeneticInbreedingAnimalsChromosome MappingComputer SimulationFemaleMaleMiceQuantitative Trait LociRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID21385723
PMCPMC3120149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.