Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21385641›Full record

Trial reportEating behaviors2011

Dietary energy density and successful weight loss maintenance.

Hollie A Raynor, Emily L Van Walleghen, Jessica L Bachman, Shannon M Looney, Suzanne Phelan, Rena R Wing

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eating behaviors, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01849627 (Eat Well for Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01849627 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Eat Well for Life: A Weight Loss Maintenance Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleRan2014 to 2025Enrolled345ConditionsObesityArmsLow-ED, Energy Balance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Weight maintenance: challenges, tools and strategies for primary care physicians.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Weight loss maintenance: A review on dietary related strategies.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hollie A RaynorDepartment of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1215 W. Cumberland Ave, JHB 229, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. hraynor@utk.edu
Emily L Van Walleghen
Jessica L Bachman
Shannon M Looney
Suzanne Phelan
Rena R Wing

Funding

Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance (RMI)R01DK066787 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI WING, RENA R · 2004 to 2007
$1.6M
Reducing snack food variety during obesity treatmentR01DK074721 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI RAYNOR, HOLLIE A · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK066787NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK066787NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074721NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK074721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research shows a positive relationship between dietary energy density (ED) and body mass index (BMI), but dietary ED of weight loss maintainers is unknown. This preliminary investigation was a secondary data analysis that compared self-reported dietary ED and food group servings consumed in overweight adults (OW: BMI=27-45kg/m(2)), normal weight adults (NW: BMI=19-24.9 kg/m(2)), and weight loss maintainers (WLM: current BMI=19-24.9kg/m(2) [lost≥10% of maximum body weight and maintained loss for ≥5years]) participating in 2 studies, with data collected from July 2006 to March 2007. Three 24-h phone dietary recalls from 287 participants (OW=97, NW=85, WLM=105) assessed self-reported dietary intake. ED (kcal/g) was calculated by three methods (food+all beverages except water [F+AB], food+caloric beverages [F+CB], and food only [FO]). Differences in self-reported consumption of dietary ED, food group servings, energy, grams of food/beverages, fat, and fiber were assessed using one-way MANCOVA, adjusting for age, sex, and weekly energy expenditure from self-reported physical activity. ED, calculated by all three methods, was significantly lower in WLM than in NW or OW (FO: WLM=1.39±0.45kcal/g; NW=1.60±0.43 kcal/g; OW=1.83±0.42 kcal/g). Self-reported daily servings of vegetables and whole grains consumed were significantly higher in WLM compared to NW and OW (vegetables: WLM=4.9±3.1 servings/day; NW=3.9±2.0 servings/day; OW=3.4±1.7 servings/day; whole grains: WLM=2.2±1.8 servings/day; NW=1.4±1.2 servings/day; OW=1.3±1.3 servings/day). WLM self-reported consuming significantly less energy from fat and more fiber than the other two groups. Self-reported energy intake per day was significantly lower in WLM than OW, and WLM self-reported consuming significantly more grams of food/beverages per day than OW. These preliminary findings suggest that consuming a diet lower in ED, characterized by greater intake of vegetables and whole grains, may aid with weight loss maintenance and should be further tested in prospective randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexDietary FatsDietary FiberEnergy IntakeWeight LossAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceDietDiet RecordsFemaleFood PreferencesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleDietary FatsDietary Fiber

Identifiers

PMID21385641
PMCPMC3066438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.