Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21385471›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2011

Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia.

Jennifer Walker, Christopher K Fairley, Eve Urban, Marcus Y Chen, Catriona Bradshaw, Sandra M Walker, Basil Donovan, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Kathleen McNamee, Marian Currie and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Influence of cervicovaginal microbiota onMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenging recruitment of youth with type 2 diabetes into clinical trials.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jennifer WalkerCentre for Women's Health, Gender and Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. walker@unimelb.edu.au
Christopher K Fairley
Eve Urban
Marcus Y Chen
Catriona Bradshaw
Sandra M Walker
Basil Donovan
Sepehr N Tabrizi
Kathleen McNamee
Marian Currie
Marie Pirotta
John Kaldor
Lyle C Gurrin
Hudson Birden
Veerakathy Harindra
Francis J Bowden
Suzanne Garland
Jane M Gunn
Jane S Hocking

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCohort studies are an important study design however they are difficult to implement, often suffer from poor retention, low participation and bias. The aims of this paper are to describe the methods used to recruit and retain young women in a longitudinal study and to explore factors associated with loss to follow up.

methodsThe Chlamydia Incidence and Re-infection Rates Study (CIRIS) was a longitudinal study of Australian women aged 16 to 25 years recruited from primary health care clinics. They were followed up via the post at three-monthly intervals and required to return questionnaires and self collected vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. The protocol was designed to maximise retention in the study and included using recruiting staff independent of the clinic staff, recruiting in private, regular communication with study staff, making the follow up as straightforward as possible and providing incentives and small gifts to engender good will.

resultsThe study recruited 66% of eligible women. Despite the nature of the study (sexual health) and the mobility of the women (35% moved address at least once), 79% of the women completed the final stage of the study after 12 months. Loss to follow up bias was associated with lower education level [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.5, 1.0)], recruitment from a sexual health centre as opposed to a general practice clinic [AHR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.7)] and previously testing positive for chlamydia [AHR: 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.0)]. No other factors such as age, numbers of sexual partners were associated with loss to follow up.

conclusionsThe methods used were considered effective for recruiting and retaining women in the study. Further research is needed to improve participation from less well-educated women.

Indexed as

Patient DropoutsPatient SelectionAdolescentAdultAustraliaChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisCohort StudiesFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRecurrenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21385471
PMCPMC3061916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.