Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21385044›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2011

On the genealogy of asexual diploids.

Fumei Lam, Charles H Langley, Yun S Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fumei LamDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA. flam@cs.ucdavis.edu
Charles H Langley
Yun S Song

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
Novel Methods for Characterizing Recombination and SelectionK99GM080099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SONG, YUN S. · 2007 to 2007
$85k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG002942NIGMS NIH HHS K99-GM080099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract Given molecular genetic data from diploid individuals that, at present, reproduce mostly or exclusively asexually without recombination, an important problem in evolutionary biology is detecting evidence of past sexual reproduction (i.e., meiosis and mating) and recombination (both meiotic and mitotic). However, currently there is a lack of computational tools for carrying out such a study. In this article, we formulate a new problem of reconstructing diploid genealogies under the assumption of no sexual reproduction or recombination, with the ultimate goal being to devise genealogy-based tools for testing deviation from these assumptions. We first consider the infinite-sites model of mutation and develop linear-time algorithms to test the existence of an asexual diploid genealogy compatible with the infinite-sites model of mutation, and to construct one if it exists. In this ideal case, our chance of detecting signatures of past sexual reproduction is maximized. Then, we relax the infinite-sites assumption and develop an integer linear programming formulation to reconstruct asexual diploid genealogies with the minimum number of homoplasy (back or recurrent mutation) events. If this number is substantially larger than that expected for typical asexual organisms, then it may suggest that sexual reproduction or recombination may have played an important role in the evolutionary history. We apply our algorithms on simulated data sets with sizes of biological interest.

Indexed as

DiploidyReproduction, AsexualAlgorithmsAnimalsBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationHaplotypesModels, GeneticMutationPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID21385044
PMCPMC3123918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.