Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21384106›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2011

Interaction between expectancies and drug effects: an experimental investigation of placebo analgesia with caffeine as an active placebo.

Espen Bjørkedal, Magne Arve Flaten

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Harnessing placebo: Lessons from psychedelic science.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug-Placebo Additivity in Randomized Clinical Trials.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Espen BjørkedalDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. espen.bjorkedal@uit.no
Magne Arve Flaten
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIn a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial it is assumed that psychosocial effects of the treatment, regression to the mean and spontaneous remission are identical in the drug and placebo group. Consequently, any difference between the groups can be ascribed to the pharmacological effects. Previous studies suggest that side effects of drugs can enhance expectancies of treatment effects in the drug group compared to the placebo group, and thereby increase placebo responses in the drug group compared to the placebo group.

objectivesThe hypothesis that side effects of drugs can enhance expectancies and placebo responses was tested.

methodPainful laser stimuli were delivered to 20 healthy subjects before and after administration of a drink with 0 or 4 mg/kg caffeine. The drink was administered either with information that it contained a painkiller or that it was a placebo. Laser-evoked potentials and reports of pain, expectancy, arousal and stress were measured.

resultsFour milligrammes per kilogramme of caffeine reduced pain. Information that a painkiller was administered increased the analgesic effect of caffeine compared to caffeine administered with no drug information. This effect was mediated by expectancies. Information and expectancies had no effect on pain intensity when 0 mg/kg was administered.

conclusionThe analgesic effect of caffeine was increased by information that a painkiller was administered. This was due to an interaction of the pharmacological action of the drug and expectancies. Hence, psychosocial effects accompanying a treatment can differ when an active drug is administered compared to a placebo.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectAdolescentAdultAnalgesicsArousalCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLasersMalePainPain MeasurementStress, PsychologicalAnalgesicsCaffeineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID21384106
PMCPMC3090576
OpenAlexW1970902728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.