Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21383028›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2011

Chemoprevention of intestinal polyps in ApcMin/+ mice fed with western or balanced diets by drinking annurca apple polyphenol extract.

Lucia Fini, Giulia Piazzi, Yahya Daoud, Michael Selgrad, Shinji Maegawa, Melissa Garcia, Vincenzo Fogliano, Marco Romano, Giulia Graziani, Paola Vitaglione and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phytochemicals in the Fight Against Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Phytochemicals and colorectal cancer prevention--myth or reality?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia FiniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Research Institute, Sammons Cancer Center, USA.
Giulia Piazzi
Yahya Daoud
Michael Selgrad
Shinji Maegawa
Melissa Garcia
Vincenzo Fogliano
Marco Romano
Giulia Graziani
Paola Vitaglione
Susanne W Carmack
Antonio Gasbarrini
Robert M Genta
Jean-Pierre Issa
C Richard Boland
Luigi Ricciardiello
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITBaylor University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITDallas VA Medical Center · USFondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

The Biology and Diagnosis of HNPCCR01CA072851 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI GOEL, AJAY · 1996 to 2019
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072851NCI NIH HHS R01 CA72851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Western diet (WD) is associated with a higher incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) than the Mediterranean diet. Polyphenols extracted from Annurca apple showed chemopreventive properties in CRC cells. A multifactorial, four-arm study by using wild-type (wt) and Apc(Min/+) mice was carried out to evaluate the effect on polyp number and growth of APE treatment (60 μmol/L) ad libitum in drinking water combined with a WD or a balanced diet (BD) for 12 weeks. Compared with APE treatment, we found a significant drop in body weight (P < 0.0001), severe rectal bleeding (P = 0.0076), presence of extraintestinal tumors, and poorer activity status (P = 0.0034) in water-drinking Apc(Min/+) mice, more remarkably in the WD arm. In the BD and WD groups, APE reduced polyp number (35% and 42%, respectively, P < 0.001) and growth (60% and 52%, respectively, P < 0.0001) in both colon and small intestine. Increased antioxidant activity was found in wt animals fed both diets and in Apc(Min/+) mice fed WD and drinking APE. Reduced lipid peroxidation was found in Apc(Min/+) mice drinking APE fed both diets and in wt mice fed WD. In normal mucosa, mice drinking water had lower global levels of DNA methylation than mice drinking APE. APE treatment is highly effective in reducing polyps in Apc(Min/+) mice and supports the concept that a mixture of phytochemicals, as they are naturally present in foods, represent a plausible chemopreventive agent for CRC, particularly in populations at high risk for colorectal neoplasia.

Indexed as

DietAdenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinAnimalsChlorogenic AcidColorectal NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalDNA MethylationDrinkingFemaleFlavonoidsIntestinal PolypsLipid PeroxidationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhenolsAdenomatous Polyposis Coli Proteinapple polyphenol extractChlorogenic AcidFlavonoidsPhenolsPolyphenolsTannins

Identifiers

PMID21383028
PMCPMC3793841
OpenAlexW2157744746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.