ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2010
Evolutionary transients in the rice transcriptome.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of two rice subspecies during domestication.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Rice Genomics: over the Past Two Decades and into the Future.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2018Review
- Ribogenomics: the science and knowledge of RNA.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Does the genetic code have a eukaryotic origin?Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2013Article
- The pendulum model for genome compositional dynamics: from the four nucleotides to the twenty amino acids.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Life on two tracks.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Challenges to the common dogma.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the canonical version of evolution by gene duplication, one copy is kept unaltered while the other is free to evolve. This process of evolutionary experimentation can persist for millions of years. Since it is so short lived in comparison to the lifetime of the core genes that make up the majority of most genomes, a substantial fraction of the genome and the transcriptome may-in principle-be attributable to what we will refer to as "evolutionary transients", referring here to both the process and the genes that have gone or are undergoing this process. Using the rice gene set as a test case, we argue that this phenomenon goes a long way towards explaining why there are so many more rice genes than Arabidopsis genes, and why most excess rice genes show low similarity to eudicots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.