Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21382516›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2011

The smoker's health project: a self-determination theory intervention to facilitate maintenance of tobacco abstinence.

Geoffrey C Williams, Heather Patrick, Christopher P Niemiec, Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci, Holly McGregor Lavigne

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Community physician perceptions of managing complex child and adolescent psychiatric patients: a self-determination theory perspective.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geoffrey C WilliamsUniversity of Rochester, Healthy Living Center, Center for Community Health, Rochester, NY 14607, USA. Geoffrey_Williams@URMC.Rochester.edu
Heather Patrick
Christopher P Niemiec
Richard M Ryan
Edward L Deci
Holly McGregor Lavigne

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
YOHIMBINE CHALLENGE IN PARKINSONIAN PATIENTS WITH PANIC DISORDERM01RR000044 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GUZICK, DAVID S · 1985 to 2006
$13.8M
Self-Determination and Maintaining Tobacco AbstinenceR01CA106668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, GEOFFREY C · 2004 to 2008
$2.9M
SELF DETERMINATION, SMOKING, DIET, AND HEALTHR01MH059594 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, GEOFFREY C · 1999 to 2004
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106668NCI NIH HHS R01-CA106668NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000044NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00044NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024160NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059594NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH059594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previous randomized clinical trial based on self-determination theory (SDT) and consistent with the Public Health Service (PHS) Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence demonstrated that an intensive intervention could change autonomous self-regulation and perceived competence, which in part facilitated long-term tobacco abstinence. The current article describes a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of three SDT-based intensive tobacco-dependence interventions. Eligible participants are randomized to one of the three treatment conditions designed to facilitate long-term maintenance of tobacco abstinence, namely, Community Care (CC), which includes the 6 month SDT-based intervention previously shown to promote autonomous self-regulation, perceived competence, medication use, and tobacco abstinence; Extended Need Support (ENS), which extends the 6 month SDT-based intervention to 12 months and trains an important other to provide support for smokers' basic psychological needs; and Harm Reduction (HR), which provides extended need support and recommends medication use for participants who do not want to stop smoking completely within 30 days but who are willing to reduce their cigarette use by half. The primary outcome is 12 month prolonged abstinence from tobacco, which is assessed one year following termination of treatment (two years post-randomization). Secondary outcomes include 7- and 30 day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, number of days using smoking-cessation medication, change in autonomous self-regulation and perceived competence, and perceived need support from important others.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyAdolescentAdultClinical ProtocolsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHealth BehaviorHumansMotivationPsychological TheoryRisk Reduction BehaviorSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID21382516
PMCPMC3162229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.