Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21382509›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2011

Proactive recruitment of cancer patients' social networks into a smoking cessation trial.

Lori A Bastian, Laura J Fish, Bercedis L Peterson, Andrea K Biddle, Jennifer Garst, Pauline Lyna, Stephanie Molner, Gerold Bepler, Mike Kelley, Francis J Keefe and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for smoking cessation in people diagnosed with lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Involving Family and Social Support Systems in Tobacco Cessation Treatment for Patients With Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lori A BastianDurham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. basti001@mc.duke.edu
Laura J Fish
Bercedis L Peterson
Andrea K Biddle
Jennifer Garst
Pauline Lyna
Stephanie Molner
Gerold Bepler
Mike Kelley
Francis J Keefe
Colleen M McBride
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Quit-smoking program for lung cancer patients'familiesU01CA092622 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BASTIAN, LORI A · 2004 to 2007
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS 5UO1CA-92622NCI NIH HHS U01 CA092622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis report describes the characteristics associated with successful enrollment of smokers in the social networks (i.e., family and close friends) of patients with lung cancer into a smoking cessation intervention.

methodsLung cancer patients from four clinical sites were asked to complete a survey enumerating their family members and close friends who smoke, and provide permission to contact these potential participants. Family members and close friends identified as smokers were interviewed and offered participation in a smoking cessation intervention. Repeated measures logistic regression model examined characteristics associated with enrollment.

resultsA total of 1062 eligible lung cancer patients were identified and 516 patients consented and completed the survey. These patients identified 1325 potentially eligible family and close friends. Of these, 496 consented and enrolled in the smoking cessation program. Network enrollment was highest among patients who were white and had late-stage disease. Social network members enrolled were most likely to be female, a birth family, immediate family, or close friend, and live in close geographic proximity to the patient.

conclusionsProactive recruitment of smokers in the social networks of lung cancer patients is challenging. In this study, the majority of family members and friends declined to participate. Enlisting immediate female family members and friends, who live close to the patient as agents to proactively recruit other network members into smoking cessation trials could be used to extend reach of cessation interventions to patients' social networks. Moreover, further consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of approaching network smokers to consider cessation.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPatient SelectionSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID21382509
PMCPMC3104120
OpenAlexW2171035599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.