Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21381049›Full record

ReviewMedicinal research reviews2011

Drugs that target dynamic microtubules: a new molecular perspective.

Richard A Stanton, Kim M Gernert, James H Nettles, Ritu Aneja

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal research reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 523 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Design and Pictet-Spengler enabled synthesis of carboxamide-substituted imidazo[1,2-Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of C-Terminal AmideMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard A StantonDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Kim M Gernert
James H Nettles
Ritu Aneja
Emory University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

Evaluation of antiangiogenic role of EM011, a novel tubulin-binding agentR00CA131489 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2010 to 2012
$732k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA131489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules have long been considered an ideal target for anticancer drugs because of the essential role they play in mitosis, forming the dynamic spindle apparatus. As such, there is a wide variety of compounds currently in clinical use and in development that act as antimitotic agents by altering microtubule dynamics. Although these diverse molecules are known to affect microtubule dynamics upon binding to one of the three established drug domains (taxane, vinca alkaloid, or colchicine site), the exact mechanism by which each drug works is still an area of intense speculation and research. In this study, we review the effects of microtubule-binding chemotherapeutic agents from a new perspective, considering how their mode of binding induces conformational changes and alters biological function relative to the molecular vectors of microtubule assembly or disassembly. These "biological vectors" can thus be used as a spatiotemporal context to describe molecular mechanisms by which microtubule-targeting drugs work.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMicrotubulesPharmaceutical PreparationsAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21381049
PMCPMC3155728
OpenAlexW1988263368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.