Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21380792›Full record

ReviewAdministration and policy in mental health2011

Training research: practical recommendations for maximum impact.

Rinad S Beidas, Kelly Koerner, Kenneth R Weingardt, Philip C Kendall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Administration and policy in mental health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Online Training for Prelinguistic Communication.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Internet-delivered, family-based treatment for early-onset OCD: a preliminary case series.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. rbeidas@temple.edu
Kelly Koerner
Kenneth R Weingardt
Philip C Kendall

Funding

Process as a predictor of Outcomes in CBT for YouthR01MH064484 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI KENDALL, PHILIP C · 2002 to 2004
$1.1M
A Comparison of Training Methods for DisseminationF31MH083333 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY · 2009 to 2009
$29k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH083333NIMH NIH HHS MH083333NIMH NIH HHS MH64484NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review offers practical recommendations regarding research on training in evidence-based practices for mental health and substance abuse treatment. When designing training research, we recommend: (a) aligning with the larger dissemination and implementation literature to consider contextual variables and clearly defining terminology, (b) critically examining the implicit assumptions underlying the stage model of psychotherapy development, (c) incorporating research methods from other disciplines that embrace the principles of formative evaluation and iterative review, and (d) thinking about how technology can be used to take training to scale throughout all stages of a training research project. An example demonstrates the implementation of these recommendations.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansMental Health ServicesModels, TheoreticalPsychotherapyResearch DesignTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID21380792
PMCPMC3117966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.