Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21380781›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012

A Phase II trial of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive, operable breast cancer.

Sheng Zhang, Chongjian Zhang, Jingjing Liu, Li Qin, Shude Cui, Jin Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00488722 (A Prospective, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zoladex 3.6mg Combined With CEF Chemotherapy as Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in Hormone Responsive, Premenopausal, Operable Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00488722 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zoladex 3.6mg Combined With CEF Chemotherapy as Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in Hormone Responsive, Premenopausal, Operable Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical UniversityRan2007 to 2009ConditionsBreast CancerArmsZoladex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng Zhang3rd Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, West Beihuanhu Rd., 300060 Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Chongjian Zhang
Jingjing Liu
Li Qin
Shude Cui
Jin Zhang
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone-responsive, premenopausal, operable breast cancer. One hundred and nineteen patients with hormone-responsive, premenopausal, operable breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Zoladex at 3.6 mg was given by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin, 60-90 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2)) was administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. The primary objective was a pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in the breast. Thirty-one patients (26.1%) achieved a clinical complete response, and 76 patients (63.9%) achieved a clinical partial response; the clinical response rate was 90.0%. Fourteen patients (11.8%) achieved a pathologic complete response (T0/Tis, N0), and 20 patients (16.8%) achieved a pathologic complete response (T0/Tis, Nx). When stratified by the clinical lymph node status, the clinical partial response rate in the clinical lymph node negative group was significantly higher than in the clinical lymph node positive group (P = 0.02). When stratified by hormonal status, the clinical partial response rate in the ER and PR + group was significantly better than the ER or PR- group (P = 0.0471). There were no treatment-related deaths and no grades 3 or 4 toxicity. The most common adverse event was nausea (grade 1 65.5%, grade 2 18.5%), vomiting (grade 1 58.8%, grade 2 13.4%), and alopecia (grade 1 45.4%, grade 2 54.6%). Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy was effective as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone-responsive, premenopausal breast cancer. This regimen was particularly effective in the clinical lymph node negative group and in the ER/PR double positive group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00488722).

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesGoserelinHumansLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingCyclophosphamideEpirubicinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFluorouracilGoserelinReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID21380781
OpenAlexW2035645736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.