Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21380572›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2012

In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Jérôme Noailly, Luigi Ambrosio, K Elizabeth Tanner, Josep A Planell, Damien Lacroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.International journal of spine surgery · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.International journal of spine surgery · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using three-dimensional finite element analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jérôme NoaillyInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, 4 Torre I, Planta 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. jnoailly@ibecbarcelona.eu
Luigi Ambrosio
K Elizabeth Tanner
Josep A Planell
Damien Lacroix

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the intervertebral disc is removed to relieve chronic pain, subsequent segment stabilization should restore the functional mechanics of the native disc. Because of partially constrained motions and the lack of intrinsic rotational stiffness ball-on-socket implants present many disadvantages. Composite disc substitutes mimicking healthy disc structures should be able to assume the role expected for a disc substitute with fewer restrictions than ball-on-socket implants. A biomimetic composite disc prototype including artificial nucleus fibre-reinforced annulus and endplates was modelled as an L4-L5 disc substitute within a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model. Different device updates, i.e. changes of material properties fibre distributions and volume fractions and nucleus placements were proposed. Load- and displacement-controlled rotations were simulated with and without body weight applied. The original prototype reduced greatly the flexibility of the treated segment with significant adjacent level effects under displacement-controlled or hybrid rotations. Device updates allowed restoring large part of the global axial and sagittal rotational flexibility predicted with the intact model. Material properties played a major role, but some other updates were identified to potentially tune the device behaviour against specific motions. All device versions altered the coupled intersegmental shear deformations affecting facet joint contact through contact area displacements. Loads in the bony endplates adjacent to the implants increased as the implant stiffness decreased but did not appear to be a strong limitation for the implant biomechanical and mechanobiological functionality. In conclusion, numerical results given by biomimetic composite disc substitutes were encouraging with greater potential than that offered by ball-on-socket implants.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeModels, BiologicalPolyethylene TerephthalatesPolymethacrylic AcidsProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularTotal Disc Replacement2-hydroxyethyl-methyacrylate-polydimethylsiloxane-methacrylate copolymerBiocompatible MaterialsPolyethylene TerephthalatesPolymethacrylic Acids

Identifiers

PMID21380572
PMCPMC3377799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.