Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21380560›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2011

The apicomplexan plastid and its evolution.

Shigeharu Sato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Apicoplast-Resident Processes: Exploiting the Chink in the Armour ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. TgKDAC4: A Unique Deacetylase ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Characterization of the apicoplast-localized enzymeThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shigeharu SatoDivision of Parasitology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK. ssato@nimr.mrc.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council U117584270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protistan species belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa have a non-photosynthetic secondary plastid-the apicoplast. Although its tiny genome and even the entire nuclear genome has been sequenced for several organisms bearing the organelle, the reason for its existence remains largely obscure. Some of the functions of the apicoplast, including housekeeping ones, are significantly different from those of other plastids, possibly due to the organelle's unique symbiotic origin.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularApicomplexaPhylogenyPlastids

Identifiers

PMID21380560
PMCPMC3064897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.