Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21380539›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2011

Modelling the topography of absolute defects in patients exposed to the anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin and in normal subjects using automated static suprathreshold perimetry of the entire 80° visual field.

Dorothea Besch, Ulrich Schiefer, Nicole Eter, Roland Burth, Christian E Elger, Manfred Spitznas, Klaus Dietz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothea BeschCentre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 12-16, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ulrich Schiefer
Nicole Eter
Roland Burth
Christian E Elger
Manfred Spitznas
Klaus Dietz
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim(i) To map the spatial distribution of absolute visual field loss (AL) in patients exposed to vigabatrin and to compare the findings with AL in normal individuals, and (ii) to describe the relationship between the major risk factors for absolute loss (gender, age, cumulative dose), and the severity of field loss, expressed as the number of locations with AL per eye.

methodsVisual field plots were retrospectively reviewed from 428 individuals. Perimetry was done with the Tübingen Automated Perimeter (using a threshold-oriented, marginally supraliminal strategy, 80° eccentricity, 99 test locations). Three hundred and sixty-one individuals were ophthalmologically normal, and 67 were patients exposed to vigabatrin who had performed reliably during perimetry prior to neurosurgery for epilepsy. Two hundred and sixty-six of the 361 normals were included on the empirical basis that they manifested AL at no more than 19 stimulus locations per eye (the 74th percentile). The frequency per eye of AL at each of 99 stimulus locations was determined for the normals and patients. The effects of age, gender and cumulative dose of vigabatrin on the number of ALs per individual was assessed by an analysis of covariance. A stochastic model was developed to determine the 50% probability of AL at each location.

resultsThirty-nine of the 67 vigabatrin patients exhibited at least 20 locations with AL. The number of ALs was independent of age (p  =  0.7603). The frequency of AL was 14.8% in the peripheral field and 1.0% in the central field (odds ratio 16.7; 95% CI 15.0-18.6%; p  <  0.0001). Those exposed to vigabatrin exhibited a frequency of 17.1% ALs, compared to 5.2% for the normal individuals (odds ratio 3.77, 95% CI 3.6-4.0%; p  <  0.0001). According to the modelled data, males exhibited 20.9% (95% CI 1.3-44%; p  =  0.0360) more absolute losses than did females. The number of absolute losses per person doubled with an increase in cumulative dose of vigabatrin of 936 g (95% CI 775-1181 g).

conclusionsAccording to this retrospective study, the spatial configuration of absolute defects attributable to vigabatrin indicates sparing of the temporal field up to approximately 60° eccentricity. Such a finding is likely to explain, at least in part, the initially asymptomatic nature of the defect. This study reconfirms a (cumulative) dose effect of vigabatrin on the extent of absolute field loss, with a greater risk for male gender.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsChildCross-Sectional StudiesEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVigabatrinVision DisordersVisual FieldsAnticonvulsantsVigabatrin

Identifiers

PMID21380539
OpenAlexW2106424911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.